H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Selima Sfar H2H: 1-0
Ludmila Cervanova holds a 1–0 lead over Selima Sfar in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ludmila Cervanova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ludmila Cervanova won the 2001 Birmingham second round 4-6 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 49
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2001* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Ludmila Cervanova | 4-6 6-4 7-6(2) | Selima Sfar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Selima Sfar | #1,005 | #75 | 456 | 1,591 | 21 | 54 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Selima Sfar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #193 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |