H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Ludmila Cervanova vs Silvija Talaja H2H: 0-2
Silvija Talaja holds a 2–0 lead over Ludmila Cervanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silvija Talaja leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Silvija Talaja won the 2002 Warsaw quarterfinal 2-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 46
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2002* | Warsaw | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
| Apr 9, 1999* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Silvija Talaja | 6-3 6-2 | Ludmila Cervanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ludmila Cervanova | #889 | #58 | 578 | 1,694 | 76 | 96 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Silvija Talaja | #1,214 | #18 | 1,376 | 1,811 | 130 | 151 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ludmila Cervanova | Silvija Talaja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #280 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #135 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #102 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #92 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #29 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #103 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #29 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2003 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #64 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #96 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,559 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #119 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #325 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #114 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |