H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Ludmila Richterova vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-0

Ludmila Richterova holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Feber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ludmila Richterova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ludmila Richterova won the 1995 Key Biscayne round of 128 0-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Ludmila Richterova
CZE Age 49 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nancy Feber
BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ludmila Richterova #113 0-6 6-3 6-3 Nancy Feber #109 Match data Mar 18, 1995* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ludmila Richterova #873 #62 334 1,707 39 52 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nancy Feber #589 #79 219 1,566 25 47 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ludmila Richterova Nancy Feber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1992 1–1 50.0% #165 1,502 0 0
17 1994 9–12 42.9% #115 1,518 0 0 1993 3–9 25.0% #152 1,486 0 0
18 1995 17–16 51.5% #67 1,642 0 1 1994 4–9 30.8% #124 1,482 0 0
19 1996 9–15 37.5% #67 1,621 0 1 1995 9–12 42.9% #101 1,549 0 0
20 1997 3–7 30.0% #161 1,578 0 1 1996 6–12 33.3% #109 1,513 0 0
21 1998 1–2 33.3% #221 1,568 0 1 1997 2–4 33.3% #177 1,516 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ludmila Richterova Nancy Feber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1994 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1996 4 8 12 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 2 7 9 22.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 11 24 35 31.4% 27 20 47 57.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — 10 24 34 29.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ludmila Richterova Nancy Feber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1502 100.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.25
17 1994 1518 115.8 — — — — -14 +121 — 48.0% -0.12 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +0.93 1993 1487 111.8 — — — — +51 — — 26.9% -1.54 1–1 — — -0.06
18 1995 1642 123.4 — — — — -140 +112 — 48.0% -0.44 7–4 (64%) 7–3 (70%) 105.8 -1.15 1994 1483 105.3 — — — — -15 — +102 36.7% -0.73 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.24
19 1996 1621 129.4 — — — — -127 +153 — 40.7% -0.82 1–5 (17%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 -0.18 1995 1550 117.2 — — — — -78 — +71 45.8% -0.15 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +0.43
20 1997 1578 110.7 — — — — -93 +164 — 40.0% -0.45 0–2 1–0 — +0.58 1996 1513 113.7 — — — — -89 — +173 45.5% -0.27 0–8 (0%) 4–0 (100%) 95.3 +1.75
21 1998 1568 96.9 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.28 1–0 — — -0.01 1997 1516 106.1 — — — — -48 — — 40.0% -0.70 — 2–2 (50%) — +0.12
Career — 1707 124.2 — — — — -99 +130 — 44.7% -0.53 11–17 (39%) 16–9 (64%) 101.7 +0.19 — 1567 115.2 — — — — -40 — +114 40.7% -0.55 4–16 (20%) 7–4 (64%) 94.3 +3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.