H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

M Earl vs B Pearson H2H: 0-1

B Pearson holds a 1–0 lead over M Earl in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, B Pearson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, B Pearson won the 1980 Brisbane International round of 64 6-3 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

M Earl
AUS
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
B Pearson
AUS

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
B Pearson 6-3 4-6 6-4 M Earl Match data Nov 19, 1980* R64 Brisbane International WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
M Earl — — — 1,500 0 2 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
B Pearson — — — 1,517 2 4 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

M Earl B Pearson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,470 0 0 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,501 0 0
— — — — — — — 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,467 0 0

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

M Earl B Pearson
Yr Grass Yr Grass
W L M Win % W L M Win %
1980 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 0 2 2 0.0% Career 1 1 2 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

M Earl B Pearson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1980 1470 91.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +0.27 1980 1501 94.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — +0.34
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1467 94.0 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.20
Career 1500 95.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.80 0–1 — — +13.50 Career 1517 94.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.47 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +9.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.