H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:32 UTC
Maddison Inglis vs Margarita Gasparyan H2H: 0-1
Margarita Gasparyan holds a 1–0 lead over Maddison Inglis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Margarita Gasparyan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Margarita Gasparyan won the 2016 Hobart third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 28
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 31
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2016* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Margarita Gasparyan | 6-4 6-3 | Maddison Inglis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | #151 | #112 | 654 | 1,674 | 10 | 25 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Margarita Gasparyan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #180 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,606 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #151 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |