H2H data updated: 2026-10-08 00:00 UTC

Maddison Inglis vs Sara Bejlek H2H: 0-1

Sara Bejlek holds a 1–0 lead over Maddison Inglis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Bejlek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Bejlek won the 2026 China Open second round 6-3 7-5.

Australia Age 28 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Czech Republic Age 20 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sara Bejlek #29 6-3 7-5 Maddison Inglis #140 Match data Oct 2, 2026 R64 China Open WTA 1000 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maddison Inglis #140 #112 654 1,674 11 26 29.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sara Bejlek #29 #28 1,710 1,884 28 29 49.1% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maddison Inglis Sara Bejlek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #181 1,460 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2023 0–2 0.0% #129 1,561 0 0
18 2016 0–2 0.0% #551 1,483 0 0 2024 3–4 42.9% #161 1,663 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2025 3–4 42.9% #92 1,785 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2026 22–18 55.0% #29 1,842 0 1
22 2020 0–2 0.0% #130 1,444 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2021 4–8 33.3% #141 1,473 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2022 3–5 37.5% #180 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2025 0–6 0.0% #164 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2026 4–3 57.1% #140 1,663 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maddison Inglis Sara Bejlek
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 19 10 29 65.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
22 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2026 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 10 20 30 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — 21 17 38 55.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/37 of Maddison Inglis's and 52/58 of Sara Bejlek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maddison Inglis Sara Bejlek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.2% 59.4% 38.5% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 27.7%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 2/2 0.0 5.0 69.5% 40.0% 38.6% 35.4% 83.3% 39.5% 33.9%
18 2016 2/2 1.0 2.5 54.9% 46.5% 36.8% 29.2% 37.5% 42.0% 34.0% 2024 7/7 0.4 4.3 65.4% 56.4% 39.8% 57.6% 43.9% 50.2% 46.7%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 5/7 0.0 2.4 73.6% 56.5% 59.4% 36.1% 67.5% 56.9% 45.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 37/41 1.0 2.6 62.8% 59.3% 47.0% 52.2% 48.1% 54.8% 45.6%
22 2020 2/2 0.5 3.0 71.5% 51.6% 41.5% 45.8% 52.5% 48.6% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 12/12 2.0 2.8 62.7% 59.4% 45.8% 48.3% 28.1% 54.2% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 8/8 2.6 3.6 66.2% 60.4% 40.2% 48.3% 61.8% 54.1% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 4/6 2.3 4.0 59.3% 53.7% 47.4% 40.7% 25.8% 51.4% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2026 6/7 1.3 1.5 66.4% 59.4% 48.0% 38.3% 53.7% 55.6% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 34/37 1.9 2.9 63.8% 57.8% 44.3% 44.4% 42.2% 53.1% 39.5% — 52/58 0.8 2.9 64.3% 57.9% 46.7% 50.7% 49.9% 53.7% 44.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maddison Inglis Sara Bejlek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1483 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1460 103.3 -0.63 +4.78 0.553 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.09
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1561 99.6 -2.36 -0.77 0.561 38.0% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — +0.05
18 2016 1484 102.2 -2.40 -1.06 0.587 38.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.15 2024 1664 121.5 -1.97 +1.26 0.939 48.6% — +58 — 43.8% -0.38 1–1 1–1 — -0.51
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1785 124.3 -1.30 -0.39 1.055 51.6% -174 — — 46.7% -0.07 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.15
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1843 147.3 -1.50 +3.05 1.008 50.2% +6 -26 -253 53.5% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 7–5 (58%) 106.4 -0.22
21 2019 1477 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2020 1445 97.5 -1.27 +0.38 0.766 44.5% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2021 1474 111.4 -2.32 -2.08 0.865 46.8% +4 — — 33.3% -1.44 2–1 (67%) — — +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2022 1485 99.8 -2.83 -0.47 0.921 48.4% +26 — — 42.9% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2023 1475 90.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2024 1455 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2025 1582 115.3 -2.30 -1.96 0.751 43.7% -5 — — 14.3% -2.00 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2026 1664 118.0 +1.05 -0.12 0.890 47.5% +26 — — 46.7% -0.66 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1674 110.9 -1.79 -1.14 0.842 46.3% +13 — — 32.6% -1.45 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.4 +1.61 — 1885 137.3 -1.56 +2.36 0.970 49.4% -20 +12 -253 48.8% -0.07 7–4 (64%) 9–8 (53%) 104.8 -1.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.