Maddison Inglis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Sofia Kenin | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Sara Bejlek | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 2, 2026 | H2H |
| Zeynep Sonmez | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 9, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-08 00:00 UTC
Sara Bejlek holds a 1–0 lead over Maddison Inglis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Bejlek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sara Bejlek won the 2026 China Open second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sara Bejlek | 6-3 7-5 | Maddison Inglis | Match data | Oct 2, 2026 | R64 | China Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maddison Inglis | #140 | #112 | 654 | 1,674 | 11 | 26 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sara Bejlek | #29 | #28 | 1,710 | 1,884 | 28 | 29 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Sara Bejlek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #551 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #180 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #140 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Sara Bejlek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2016 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 19 | 10 | 29 | 65.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 22 | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 10 | 20 | 30 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | 21 | 17 | 38 | 55.3% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 34/37 of Maddison Inglis's and 52/58 of Sara Bejlek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Sara Bejlek | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 55.2% | 59.4% | 38.5% | 50.0% | 0.0% | 50.0% | 27.7% |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 69.5% | 40.0% | 38.6% | 35.4% | 83.3% | 39.5% | 33.9% |
| 18 | 2016 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 54.9% | 46.5% | 36.8% | 29.2% | 37.5% | 42.0% | 34.0% | 2024 | 7/7 | 0.4 | 4.3 | 65.4% | 56.4% | 39.8% | 57.6% | 43.9% | 50.2% | 46.7% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 5/7 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 73.6% | 56.5% | 59.4% | 36.1% | 67.5% | 56.9% | 45.5% |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 37/41 | 1.0 | 2.6 | 62.8% | 59.3% | 47.0% | 52.2% | 48.1% | 54.8% | 45.6% |
| 22 | 2020 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 71.5% | 51.6% | 41.5% | 45.8% | 52.5% | 48.6% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 12/12 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 62.7% | 59.4% | 45.8% | 48.3% | 28.1% | 54.2% | 39.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 8/8 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 66.2% | 60.4% | 40.2% | 48.3% | 61.8% | 54.1% | 42.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 4/6 | 2.3 | 4.0 | 59.3% | 53.7% | 47.4% | 40.7% | 25.8% | 51.4% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 6/7 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 66.4% | 59.4% | 48.0% | 38.3% | 53.7% | 55.6% | 39.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 34/37 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 63.8% | 57.8% | 44.3% | 44.4% | 42.2% | 53.1% | 39.5% | — | 52/58 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 64.3% | 57.9% | 46.7% | 50.7% | 49.9% | 53.7% | 44.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Maddison Inglis | Sara Bejlek | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1483 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1460 | 103.3 | -0.63 | +4.78 | 0.553 | 40.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1561 | 99.6 | -2.36 | -0.77 | 0.561 | 38.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 18 | 2016 | 1484 | 102.2 | -2.40 | -1.06 | 0.587 | 38.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.15 | 2024 | 1664 | 121.5 | -1.97 | +1.26 | 0.939 | 48.6% | — | +58 | — | 43.8% | -0.38 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.51 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1785 | 124.3 | -1.30 | -0.39 | 1.055 | 51.6% | -174 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.07 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.15 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1843 | 147.3 | -1.50 | +3.05 | 1.008 | 50.2% | +6 | -26 | -253 | 53.5% | +0.28 | 6–2 (75%) | 7–5 (58%) | 106.4 | -0.22 |
| 21 | 2019 | 1477 | 102.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2020 | 1445 | 97.5 | -1.27 | +0.38 | 0.766 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2021 | 1474 | 111.4 | -2.32 | -2.08 | 0.865 | 46.8% | +4 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.44 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2022 | 1485 | 99.8 | -2.83 | -0.47 | 0.921 | 48.4% | +26 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.10 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–0 | — | +0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2023 | 1475 | 90.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2024 | 1455 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2025 | 1582 | 115.3 | -2.30 | -1.96 | 0.751 | 43.7% | -5 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.00 | 0–2 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2026 | 1664 | 118.0 | +1.05 | -0.12 | 0.890 | 47.5% | +26 | — | — | 46.7% | -0.66 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.4 | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1674 | 110.9 | -1.79 | -1.14 | 0.842 | 46.3% | +13 | — | — | 32.6% | -1.45 | 6–8 (43%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.4 | +1.61 | — | 1885 | 137.3 | -1.56 | +2.36 | 0.970 | 49.4% | -20 | +12 | -253 | 48.8% | -0.07 | 7–4 (64%) | 9–8 (53%) | 104.8 | -1.64 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 26, 2026 | H2H |
| Sofia Kenin | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 6, 2025 | H2H |
| Sara Bejlek | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 2, 2026 | H2H |
| Zeynep Sonmez | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 30, 2026 | H2H |
| Sorana Cirstea | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Blinkova | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 21, 2026 | H2H |
| Ashlyn Krueger | 2 | 1 | 3 | Feb 2, 2026 | H2H |
| Cristina Bucsa | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 17, 2026 | H2H |
| Alycia Parks | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sep 15, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 2 | 0 | 2 | Aug 18, 2026 | H2H |