H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maddison Inglis vs Sara Errani

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Maddison Inglis vs Sara Errani.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maddison Inglis
Australia Age 28 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Sara Errani
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maddison Inglis #129 7-6(4) 7-6(1) Sara Errani #145 Match data Feb 12, 2022 Q1 Q Dubai Tennis Championships WTA 500 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maddison Inglis #134 #112 654 1,674 10 25 28.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sara Errani #476 #5 5,835 2,005 387 304 56.0% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maddison Inglis Sara Errani
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2016 0–2 0.0% #551 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — 2006 3–3 50.0% #174 1,529 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2007 10–7 58.8% #69 1,613 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2008 29–22 56.9% #42 1,735 0 2
22 2020 0–2 0.0% #130 1,444 0 0 2009 25–27 48.1% #47 1,655 0 2
23 2021 4–8 33.3% #141 1,473 0 0 2010 36–29 55.4% #43 1,722 0 2
24 2022 3–5 37.5% #180 1,484 0 0 2011 30–26 53.6% #45 1,673 0 2
25 — — — — — — — 2012 53–20 72.6% #6 1,897 0 6
26 — — — — — — — 2013 46–22 67.6% #7 1,885 0 7
27 2025 0–6 0.0% #164 1,581 0 0 2014 35–23 60.3% #14 1,773 0 7
28 2026 3–2 60.0% #134 1,627 0 0 2015 46–26 63.9% #20 1,751 0 8
29 — — — — — — — 2016 21–23 47.7% #49 1,656 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 2017 18–16 52.9% #144 1,652 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 2018 6–8 42.9% #112 1,767 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 2019 2–6 25.0% #198 1,575 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 2020 4–3 57.1% #131 1,606 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 2021 8–12 40.0% #121 1,574 0 9
35 — — — — — — — 2022 2–5 28.6% #109 1,606 0 9
36 — — — — — — — 2023 3–10 23.1% #105 1,548 0 9
37 — — — — — — — 2024 10–14 41.7% #105 1,693 0 9
38 — — — — — — — 2025 0–2 0.0% #476 1,590 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maddison Inglis Sara Errani
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2016 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 14 10 24 58.3% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2021 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 21 16 37 56.8% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2022 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 14 16 30 46.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 23 14 37 62.2% 28 3 31 90.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 22 15 37 59.5% 21 5 26 80.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
27 2025 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 13 14 27 48.1% 19 6 25 76.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2026 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 22 17 39 56.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 13 14 27 48.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 7 6 13 53.8% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 3 4 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 4 6 10 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 19 28 32.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — 178 160 338 52.7% 188 115 303 62.0% 15 26 41 36.6% 6 3 9 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 32/35 of Maddison Inglis's and 593/692 of Sara Errani's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Maddison Inglis Sara Errani
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2016 2/2 1.0 2.5 54.9% 46.5% 36.8% 29.2% 37.5% 42.0% 34.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/6 0.0 1.0 76.4% 33.3% 38.5% 50.0% 16.7% 34.5% 39.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 12/17 0.8 2.3 66.1% 56.1% 48.0% 41.1% 52.6% 53.4% 44.4%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/51 0.5 2.7 64.2% 57.6% 46.0% 48.1% 45.8% 53.2% 45.7%
22 2020 2/2 0.5 3.0 71.5% 51.6% 41.5% 45.8% 52.5% 48.6% 39.3% 2009 44/52 0.3 2.5 69.2% 55.6% 44.7% 50.9% 45.1% 52.5% 44.6%
23 2021 12/12 2.0 2.8 62.7% 59.4% 45.8% 48.3% 28.1% 54.2% 39.6% 2010 59/65 0.4 1.5 75.4% 56.2% 44.0% 55.5% 51.2% 53.4% 47.7%
24 2022 8/8 2.6 3.6 66.2% 60.4% 40.2% 48.3% 61.8% 54.1% 42.3% 2011 53/56 0.4 1.9 76.2% 57.7% 47.2% 52.0% 48.6% 55.0% 47.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 63/73 0.3 1.1 76.1% 60.2% 49.9% 54.1% 56.5% 57.5% 51.5%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 57/68 0.1 1.1 82.1% 57.9% 48.5% 52.4% 51.1% 56.1% 50.4%
27 2025 4/6 2.3 4.0 59.3% 53.7% 47.4% 40.7% 25.8% 51.4% 36.5% 2014 54/58 0.1 1.2 81.3% 56.1% 45.3% 52.4% 50.1% 54.1% 48.1%
28 2026 4/5 1.8 2.0 63.5% 60.8% 47.0% 40.1% 52.4% 55.8% 36.9% 2015 54/72 0.1 1.4 83.3% 54.9% 50.0% 49.2% 55.4% 54.2% 49.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 38/45 0.1 1.2 85.4% 52.9% 43.6% 51.6% 52.4% 51.5% 48.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 31/34 0.1 1.3 78.7% 52.5% 41.2% 40.6% 54.1% 50.3% 49.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 14/14 0.1 2.9 81.3% 57.5% 36.7% 41.9% 45.6% 53.8% 46.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 8/8 0.1 8.0 61.0% 51.0% 28.4% 30.1% 44.3% 42.3% 46.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 0.0 4.6 77.6% 54.9% 39.2% 58.2% 57.5% 51.3% 51.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 19/20 0.1 2.9 78.4% 52.1% 36.1% 52.3% 55.8% 48.5% 49.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 7/7 0.0 1.9 80.7% 52.1% 33.4% 39.3% 47.1% 48.4% 45.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 13/13 0.0 1.5 79.1% 47.8% 31.7% 36.6% 49.8% 44.5% 41.9%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 23/24 0.1 1.5 77.5% 52.4% 42.3% 41.1% 47.1% 49.8% 44.4%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 2/2 0.0 1.5 82.0% 53.3% 47.6% 49.5% 75.0% 52.2% 36.8%
Career — 32/35 2.0 3.0 63.3% 57.8% 43.9% 45.0% 41.4% 52.9% 39.2% — 593/692 0.2 1.7 77.3% 55.8% 44.9% 49.9% 51.1% 53.3% 47.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maddison Inglis Sara Errani
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2016 1484 102.2 -2.40 -1.06 0.587 38.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1529 107.3 -2.72 -1.03 0.604 36.7% — +41 — 46.2% -0.39 1–0 1–0 — -0.21
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1614 121.3 -0.77 +0.04 0.953 49.0% -56 +20 — 55.0% +0.43 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -0.20
21 2019 1477 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1735 135.4 -1.78 +1.64 0.976 49.4% -49 -6 -147 53.8% +0.34 10–7 (59%) 4–5 (44%) 102.2 -1.64
22 2020 1445 97.5 -1.27 +0.38 0.766 44.5% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.11 2009 1655 132.5 -2.62 +1.07 0.938 48.6% +1 +49 -81 50.9% +0.04 5–7 (42%) 6–3 (67%) 100.5 +0.75
23 2021 1474 111.4 -2.32 -2.08 0.865 46.8% +4 — — 33.3% -1.44 2–1 (67%) — — +0.33 2010 1723 134.3 -2.26 +3.11 1.025 50.6% +16 -53 -104 56.5% +0.29 6–11 (35%) 12–6 (67%) 100.8 +1.24
24 2022 1485 99.8 -2.83 -0.47 0.921 48.4% +26 — — 42.9% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.75 2011 1673 134.0 -0.30 +3.09 1.047 51.0% -6 +66 -54 54.0% +0.26 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.90
25 2023 1475 90.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1898 155.0 +1.80 +6.73 1.210 54.4% -78 +149 -273 69.0% +1.52 11–5 (69%) 7–3 (70%) 107.8 -1.43
26 2024 1455 100.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1886 156.0 +1.16 +6.37 1.149 53.2% -27 +186 — 62.2% +0.85 10–5 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.2 -0.44
27 2025 1582 115.3 -2.30 -1.96 0.751 43.7% -5 — — 14.3% -2.00 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.01 2014 1774 140.1 -1.37 +3.74 1.048 51.1% -49 +280 — 58.0% +0.40 9–10 (47%) 10–6 (63%) 95.0 +2.02
28 2026 1628 113.3 +0.91 +0.33 0.836 46.3% +32 — — 45.5% -0.82 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.4 -0.15 2015 1752 137.5 -3.26 +7.03 1.083 52.0% -25 +216 -179 58.6% +0.66 18–11 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 104.0 +3.08
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1657 128.4 -3.45 +3.74 0.989 49.8% +7 +192 -112 49.5% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 94.9 +0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1652 117.1 -4.83 +3.87 0.998 49.9% +19 +108 — 53.3% +0.13 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.62
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1767 125.7 -0.84 +2.69 0.996 50.0% +17 -5 — 48.5% -0.21 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 96.4 -1.13
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1575 92.5 -7.16 -0.74 0.798 44.2% — +37 — 31.6% -1.74 1–2 (33%) — — +0.92
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1607 122.5 -2.17 +3.15 1.053 51.1% — +33 — 55.6% +0.06 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.05
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1575 114.0 -4.44 +2.94 0.966 49.1% -11 +76 — 39.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.94
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1607 109.2 -3.27 +0.30 0.881 46.5% — +45 — 35.7% -0.64 1–1 0–1 — -0.07
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1548 97.8 -6.59 -1.63 0.755 43.4% -51 +75 -7 24.1% -2.07 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.14
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1693 123.6 -4.63 +1.30 0.884 47.1% -121 +82 — 37.7% -0.94 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 106.5 -1.08
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1590 105.5 -0.55 +0.36 0.771 45.0% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.15
Career — 1674 109.6 -1.98 -1.14 0.832 46.1% +13 — — 31.7% -1.51 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.4 +2.00 — 2006 138.5 -1.81 +3.71 1.026 50.6% -25 +106 -122 54.6% +0.29 105–95 (53%) 85–59 (59%) 104.5 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.