H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Madison Keys vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 7-0

Madison Keys holds a 7–0 lead over Alison Riske-Amritraj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Madison Keys leads 4–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Madison Keys won the 2022 Indian Wells third round 7-6(4) 6-1.

USA Age 31 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
7 0
7 main draw meetings
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 14, 2022* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Madison Keys #29 7-6(4) 6-1 Alison Riske-Amritraj #53 Match data
Jan 15, 2022 Adelaide 250 WTA 250 F Hard Madison Keys #87 6-1 6-2 Alison Riske-Amritraj #57 Match data
Aug 31, 2016* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Madison Keys #9 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 Alison Riske-Amritraj #60 Match data
May 2, 2016 Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Madison Keys #25 1-6 6-3 6-4 Alison Riske-Amritraj #91 Match data
Oct 1, 2014* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Madison Keys #32 6-3 6-7(3) 7-5 Alison Riske-Amritraj #60 Match data
May 23, 2014* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Madison Keys #44 6-4 6-4 Alison Riske-Amritraj #43 Match data
May 14, 2014* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Madison Keys #47 6-2 6-2 Alison Riske-Amritraj #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Madison Keys #23 #5 4,999 2,136 363 211 63.2% 1 1 0 6 3 11
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,853 191 202 48.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Madison Keys Alison Riske-Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2009 1–1 50.0% #616 1,512 0 0
16 2011 1–2 33.3% #273 1,516 0 0
17 2012 1–4 20.0% #137 1,514 0 0
18 2013 24–17 58.5% #38 1,726 0 0
19 2014 27–21 56.2% #30 1,742 0 1 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2015 31–19 62.0% #18 1,802 0 1 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,529 0 0
21 2016 41–16 71.9% #8 1,915 0 2 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,488 0 0
22 2017 17–10 63.0% #19 1,892 0 3 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,642 0 0
23 2018 28–15 65.1% #17 1,899 0 3 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,713 0 1
24 2019 27–13 67.5% #13 1,910 0 5 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 2020 8–5 61.5% #16 1,866 0 5 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,742 0 1
26 2021 11–15 42.3% #56 1,731 0 5 2017 21–24 46.7% #70 1,650 0 1
27 2022 30–19 61.2% #11 1,863 0 6 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,632 0 1
28 2023 29–17 63.0% #12 1,879 0 7 2019 26–23 53.1% #18 1,797 0 2
29 2024 25–12 67.6% #21 1,950 0 8 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,739 0 2
30 2025 37–15 71.2% #7 1,964 1 10 2021 16–15 51.6% #51 1,771 0 3
31 2026 25–10 71.4% #23 2,020 1 11 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,750 0 3
32 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,614 0 3