H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Amy Frazier H2H: 1-1

Magdalena Maleeva and Amy Frazier are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on grass, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2002 US Open third round 3-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2002* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Amy Frazier #73 3-6 6-2 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #17 Match data
Jul 1, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Magdalena Maleeva #14 6-3 6-2 Amy Frazier #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8