H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Amy Frazier H2H: 1-1

Magdalena Maleeva and Amy Frazier are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on grass, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amy Frazier won the 2002 US Open round of 32 3-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amy Frazier #73 3-6 6-2 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #17 Match data Sep 1, 2002* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Magdalena Maleeva #14 6-3 6-2 Amy Frazier #22 Match data Jul 1, 2001* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,069 389 275 58.6% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,956 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,498 0 0 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,636 0 0
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,717 0 0 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,717 0 1
17 1992 30–15 66.7% #20 1,926 0 1 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,891 0 2
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,966 0 1 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,812 0 2
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,989 0 3 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,843 0 3
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,047 0 6 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,844 0 3
21 1996 20–16 55.6% #19 1,924 0 6 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,759 0 6 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,876 0 5
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,721 0 6 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,836 0 5
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,741 0 7 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,819 0 5
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,850 0 8 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,877 0 6
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,856 0 9 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,853 0 6
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,696 0 6
29 2004 28–25 52.8% #25 1,695 0 10 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,679 0 10 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,726 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,825 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,729 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Amy Frazier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1989 21 9 30 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1992 8 3 11 72.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
18 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1991 17 12 29 58.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
19 1994 10 4 14 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 1 14 92.9% 1992 22 10 32 68.8% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 21 4 25 84.0% 1993 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1994 23 8 31 74.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1995 19 9 28 67.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1999 5 0 5 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1997 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1998 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1999 25 14 39 64.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2000 25 13 38 65.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2003 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2001 10 10 20 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2004 12 15 27 44.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2002 14 12 26 53.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2005 9 11 20 45.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2003 11 8 19 57.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 27 11 38 71.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 133 117 250 53.2% 105 74 179 58.7% 41 25 66 62.1% 110 59 169 65.1% — 306 190 496 61.7% 38 44 82 46.3% 30 33 63 47.6% 42 40 82 51.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 28/138 of Magdalena Maleeva's and 34/138 of Amy Frazier's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Amy Frazier
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
28 2003 7/48 2.1 2.6 64.6% 65.7% 49.3% 52.1% 35.7% 60.1% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 10/53 2.0 3.1 65.6% 62.8% 41.0% 62.8% 38.6% 55.5% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 11/37 1.9 2.1 65.1% 64.7% 46.3% 46.7% 61.5% 58.4% 48.3% 2003 4/27 1.0 7.0 57.0% 59.8% 36.6% 49.3% 62.5% 49.5% 44.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 9/52 1.4 8.3 61.0% 61.2% 46.0% 41.9% 48.0% 55.3% 48.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/34 0.8 7.2 60.1% 58.3% 35.6% 43.8% 42.1% 49.2% 47.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 15/25 1.3 6.9 55.9% 60.7% 44.1% 51.4% 50.8% 53.1% 41.9%
Career — 28/664 2.0 2.6 65.2% 64.3% 45.2% 53.8% 46.9% 57.8% 48.3% — 34/723 1.2 7.3 58.1% 60.3% 42.2% 47.3% 49.9% 52.6% 44.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Amy Frazier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1498 109.9 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — -0.17 1987 1527 108.1 — — — — — +47 — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — +0.61
15 1990 1655 130.9 — — — — -41 -10 — 52.2% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.02 1988 1637 125.6 — — — — +7 -79 -84 44.4% -0.51 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.73
16 1991 1718 138.5 — — — — -25 -8 — 52.7% +0.09 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 101.2 -0.21 1989 1717 128.7 — — — — +48 -175 -186 56.5% +0.39 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 105.6 +1.67
17 1992 1926 159.6 — — — — -35 -68 — 66.0% +1.12 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 102.9 -1.14 1990 1892 153.8 — — — — +24 — -294 63.3% +0.94 12–7 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 102.4 -1.37
18 1993 1967 161.1 — — — — -31 -6 -321 67.9% +1.40 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 101.2 +1.36 1991 1813 142.7 — — — — +14 — -146 57.3% +0.55 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 96.5 +3.08
19 1994 1989 153.6 — — — — +43 -121 — 72.0% +1.70 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.9 +1.01 1992 1844 151.1 — — — — +7 -184 -136 62.7% +0.93 7–5 (58%) 9–3 (75%) 105.5 +0.93
20 1995 2047 157.5 — — — — +24 -68 — 67.6% +1.06 14–3 (82%) 5–3 (63%) 107.8 -0.64 1993 1845 143.2 — — — — +1 — — 50.0% -0.02 3–1 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 102.6 +0.29
21 1996 1924 151.7 — — — — +52 +67 -275 57.0% +0.65 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 92.7 -1.38 1994 1904 156.1 — — — — +63 -246 — 61.7% +0.73 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 103.2 -0.10
22 1997 1759 148.3 — — — — +60 +169 -47 50.5% +0.23 6–7 (46%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.32 1995 1877 148.4 — — — — +50 -219 — 62.6% +0.87 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 99.3 +0.40
23 1998 1722 124.2 — — — — +36 — — 39.3% -0.82 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.80 1996 1836 148.1 — — — — +37 — -100 57.1% +0.57 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 97.6 +0.72
24 1999 1741 133.4 — — — — +31 +100 +8 60.0% +1.06 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 96.9 +0.19 1997 1819 152.4 — — — — +41 -182 -89 52.6% +0.18 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 94.6 -2.18
25 2000 1813 151.1 — — — — +22 -37 -64 51.3% +0.37 5–10 (33%) 6–9 (40%) 92.4 -2.93 1998 1766 134.9 — — — — +18 — — 49.2% +0.03 6–7 (46%) 3–2 (60%) 96.6 +0.87
26 2001 1851 153.2 — — — — +18 -62 -53 56.2% +0.37 12–9 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -2.14 1999 1877 154.2 — — — — +23 -198 — 57.8% +0.40 11–7 (61%) 5–4 (56%) 101.8 -1.53
27 2002 1856 143.5 — — — — +7 -111 +10 57.2% +0.37 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 99.4 -1.27 2000 1854 148.5 — — — — +35 -256 -228 55.7% +0.28 10–8 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 104.0 -0.80
28 2003 1747 136.2 +1.69 +2.10 1.218 54.1% -21 -7 +210 55.1% +0.64 11–11 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 93.7 +2.58 2001 1696 121.2 — — — — +25 -40 -41 49.4% -0.45 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.7 +3.27
29 2004 1695 138.3 +0.28 +2.23 1.082 51.8% -48 +82 +265 52.0% +0.26 10–11 (48%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -0.09 2002 1758 137.9 — — — — -7 -98 -102 48.8% +0.10 8–6 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 99.6 -1.62
30 2005 1680 135.0 +1.49 +2.33 1.159 53.0% -29 +43 +230 49.4% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) 94.8 -0.82 2003 1727 129.3 -1.13 +0.72 0.874 46.8% +3 -101 -29 46.4% -0.07 4–2 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -0.74
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1826 140.0 +0.10 +2.08 1.076 51.4% -2 -150 -98 63.9% +0.95 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 99.8 +0.72
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1730 125.0 -2.39 +1.34 0.941 48.4% +41 -85 -50 51.9% +0.28 6–5 (55%) 3–3 (50%) 97.8 +1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1627 115.5 -1.77 -1.22 0.893 47.7% +45 -57 +111 39.3% -0.70 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 98.5 -0.09
Career — 2069 155.0 +1.11 +2.24 1.144 52.8% +3 -19 +52 57.4% +0.59 109–105 (51%) 60–65 (48%) 93.1 -0.54 — 1957 149.8 -1.31 +0.33 0.945 48.7% +26 -129 -114 55.5% +0.36 118–94 (56%) 81–65 (55%) 103.1 +0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.