H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Anke Huber H2H: 3-6

Anke Huber holds a 6–3 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Anke Huber leads 3–2 on carpet and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2001 Moscow third round 6-3 7-5.

BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 6
9 main draw meetings
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 4, 2001* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #16 6-3 7-5 Anke Huber #20 Match data
Feb 11, 2001* Paris WTA 500 SF Carpet Anke Huber #16 6-4 7-5 Magdalena Maleeva #21 Match data
Jul 9, 1999* Portschach WTA 250 R16 Clay Anke Huber #31 3-6 6-4 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #187 Match data
Jun 14, 1999 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Magdalena Maleeva #360 6-1 6-2 Anke Huber #30 Match data
Feb 6, 1998* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #31 3-6 7-6 6-1 Anke Huber #13 Match data
Jul 31, 1997* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Anke Huber #9 7-5 1-6 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #40 Match data
Oct 1, 1995* Leipzig WTA 250 F Carpet Anke Huber #10 (w/o) Magdalena Maleeva #8 Match data
Nov 15, 1993 Virginia Slims Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Anke Huber #10 6-4 1-6 7-6 Magdalena Maleeva #13 Match data
Jun 1, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Anke Huber #10 6-2 4-6 8-6 Magdalena Maleeva #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,130 393 203 65.9% 0 1 0 1 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,517 0 0
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1992 28–15 65.1% #11 1,964 0 2
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,056 0 3
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,027 0 6
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,091 0 7
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1996 45–15 75.0% #7 2,055 0 10
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,954 0 10
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,898 0 10
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,886 0 10
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,898 0 12
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10