H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Anne Kremer H2H: 2-1

Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Kremer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anne Kremer won the 2002 Filderstadt third round 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Anne Kremer
LUX Age 50 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 10, 2002* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Anne Kremer #26 6-4 7-6(5) Magdalena Maleeva #15 Match data
Apr 22, 2001* Budapest WTA 250 F Clay Magdalena Maleeva #17 3-6 6-2 6-4 Anne Kremer #32 Match data
Nov 21, 1999* Pattaya WTA 250 F Hard Magdalena Maleeva #131 4-6 6-1 6-2 Anne Kremer #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Anne Kremer #1,039 #18 1,265 1,810 147 182 44.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Anne Kremer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1995 1–1 50.0% #242 1,516 0 0
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1996 2–4 33.3% #134 1,509 0 0
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1997 1–5 16.7% #128 1,510 0 0
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1998 2–3 40.0% #74 1,553 0 0
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1999 19–23 45.2% #31 1,641 0 0
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 2000 27–24 52.9% #33 1,705 0 2
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 2001 32–28 53.3% #33 1,695 0 2
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 2002 29–28 50.9% #25 1,670 0 2
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 2003 1–2 33.3% #401 1,634 0 2
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2004 12–14 46.2% #94 1,620 0 2
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 2005 5–13 27.8% #165 1,526 0 2
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 2006 4–8 33.3% #145 1,530 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2007 7–13 35.0% #82 1,519 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2008 2–8 20.0% #265 1,461 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2009 1–3 25.0% #331 1,475 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2011 2–5 28.6% #238 1,463 0 2