H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Asa Carlsson H2H: 1-1
Magdalena Maleeva and Asa Carlsson are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on carpet, while Asa Carlsson leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Asa Carlsson won the 2002 Bol fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2002* | Bol | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Asa Carlsson | 7-5 6-3 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1995* | Moscow | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-3 6-7 6-2 | Asa Carlsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Asa Carlsson | #1,024 | #28 | 831 | 1,816 | 128 | 171 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Magdalena Maleeva | Asa Carlsson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #164 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #70 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #45 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #92 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #102 | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #78 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #345 | 1,496 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #207 | 1,465 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |