H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 3-1

Magdalena Maleeva holds a 3–1 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1996 Madrid quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 26, 1996* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Magdalena Maleeva #14 6-2 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #9 Match data
Nov 13, 1995 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 6-2 7-6 Magdalena Maleeva #7 Match data
Oct 8, 1992* Zurich WTA 250 R32 Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #20 6-3 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #30 Match data
Jan 31, 1992* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 R32 Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #39 7-6 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7