H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 1-10

Conchita Martínez holds a 10–1 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 5–0 on clay and 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2004 Eastbourne Open round of 16 3-6 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 10
11 main-draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magdalena Maleeva #23 3-6 7-5 6-4 Conchita Martínez #24 Match data Jun 18, 2004* R16 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Conchita Martínez #16 6-0 6-0 Magdalena Maleeva #27 Match data Jan 15, 2004* R32 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Conchita Martínez #6 4-6 6-3 7-5 Magdalena Maleeva #27 Match data Oct 6, 2000* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Conchita Martínez #6 3-6 6-2 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #53 Match data Jul 21, 2000* R16 Sopot Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Conchita Martínez #7 6-3 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #65 Match data Mar 15, 2000* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Conchita Martínez #3 6-1 2-6 6-1 Magdalena Maleeva #9 Match data May 11, 1996* QF Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Conchita Martínez #4 6-0 6-0 Magdalena Maleeva #8 Match data May 6, 1995* SF Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Conchita Martínez #4 6-2 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #9 Match data Apr 8, 1995* SF Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Conchita Martínez #4 6-1 6-1 Magdalena Maleeva #10 Match data Apr 2, 1995* F Hilton Head Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Conchita Martínez #6 6-2 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #11 Match data Aug 6, 1993* QF San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Conchita Martínez #8 6-3 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #20 Match data Jan 10, 1993* F Brisbane International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,069 389 275 58.6% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 676 279 70.8% 1 9 0 7 16 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,717 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,729 0 1
17 1992 30–15 66.7% #20 1,926 0 1 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,927 0 4
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,966 0 1 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,061 0 7
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,989 0 3 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,047 0 6 1992 47–17 73.4% #8 2,057 0 11
21 1996 20–16 55.6% #19 1,924 0 6 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,159 0 16
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,759 0 6 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,064 1 20
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,721 0 6 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,741 0 7 1996 47–17 73.4% #5 2,066 1 28
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,010 1 28
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,850 0 8 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,967 1 30
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,856 0 9 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2000 49–20 71.0% #5 1,922 1 32
29 2004 28–25 52.8% #25 1,695 0 10 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,843 1 32
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,679 0 10 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,755 1 32
31 — — — — — — — 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,755 1 32
32 — — — — — — — 2004 20–17 54.1% #42 1,752 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,799 1 33

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Conchita Martínez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1988 5 1 6 83.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
17 1992 8 3 11 72.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1989 20 4 24 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 17 3 20 85.0% 18 5 23 78.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
19 1994 10 4 14 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 1 14 92.9% 1991 8 6 14 57.1% 24 3 27 88.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 21 4 25 84.0% 1992 13 5 18 72.2% 21 5 26 80.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1993 28 6 34 82.4% 20 3 23 87.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 13 3 16 81.3%
22 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1994 20 7 27 74.1% 21 4 25 84.0% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 25 5 30 83.3% 24 1 25 96.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1999 5 0 5 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 19 7 26 73.1% 17 5 22 77.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 3 10 70.0%
25 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1998 18 9 27 66.7% 17 4 21 81.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1999 14 11 25 56.0% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 2003 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 25 12 37 67.6% 20 5 25 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 2004 12 15 27 44.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 2001 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2005 9 11 20 45.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2002 16 14 30 53.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 13 13 26 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 20 12 32 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
Career — 133 117 250 53.2% 105 74 179 58.7% 41 25 66 62.1% 110 59 169 65.1% — 291 137 428 68.0% 279 85 364 76.6% 48 19 67 71.6% 58 38 96 60.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Conchita Martínez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1498 109.9 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1655 130.9 — — — — -41 -10 — 52.2% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1718 138.5 — — — — -25 -8 — 52.7% +0.09 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 101.2 -0.21 1988 1730 145.2 — — — — -22 -81 — 65.2% +1.39 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 106.6 +0.57
17 1992 1926 159.6 — — — — -35 -68 — 66.0% +1.12 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 102.9 -1.14 1989 1928 154.3 — — — — -62 -75 — 77.2% +2.01 3–3 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 102.5 +1.51
18 1993 1967 161.1 — — — — -31 -6 -321 67.9% +1.40 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 101.2 +1.36 1990 2062 158.8 — — — — -43 -68 — 75.7% +1.82 5–2 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 105.9 -1.28
19 1994 1989 153.6 — — — — +43 -121 — 72.0% +1.70 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.9 +1.01 1991 2076 163.5 — — — — -95 +132 — 72.1% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 99.7 -3.74
20 1995 2047 157.5 — — — — +24 -68 — 67.6% +1.06 14–3 (82%) 5–3 (63%) 107.8 -0.64 1992 2058 170.3 — — — — -34 +215 -444 70.6% +1.60 8–7 (53%) 5–0 (100%) 103.4 -3.06
21 1996 1924 151.7 — — — — +52 +67 -275 57.0% +0.65 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 92.7 -1.38 1993 2160 168.9 — — — — -45 +158 -369 79.8% +2.22 10–4 (71%) 5–2 (71%) 102.8 +1.51
22 1997 1759 148.3 — — — — +60 +169 -47 50.5% +0.23 6–7 (46%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.32 1994 2065 167.5 — — — — -60 +202 -125 72.3% +1.80 13–5 (72%) 5–6 (45%) 103.9 -0.84
23 1998 1722 124.2 — — — — +36 — — 39.3% -0.82 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.80 1995 2182 174.1 — — — — -103 +200 -185 77.9% +2.36 13–4 (76%) 8–3 (73%) 106.8 -1.30
24 1999 1741 133.4 — — — — +31 +100 +8 60.0% +1.06 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 96.9 +0.19 1996 2067 172.1 — — — — -13 +243 +14 70.6% +1.81 8–7 (53%) 3–8 (27%) 93.2 -0.86
25 2000 1813 151.1 — — — — +22 -37 -64 51.3% +0.37 5–10 (33%) 6–9 (40%) 92.4 -2.93 1997 2010 168.8 — — — — +12 +183 +59 61.9% +1.14 10–4 (71%) 4–3 (57%) 100.5 -0.78
26 2001 1851 153.2 — — — — +18 -62 -53 56.2% +0.37 12–9 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -2.14 1998 1968 163.0 — — — — -9 +240 +102 66.7% +1.41 9–6 (60%) 5–6 (45%) 97.0 +0.15
27 2002 1856 143.5 — — — — +7 -111 +10 57.2% +0.37 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 99.4 -1.27 1999 1898 159.2 — — — — -48 +259 +117 60.1% +0.91 11–7 (61%) 4–4 (50%) 101.6 -1.25
28 2003 1747 136.2 +1.69 +2.10 1.218 54.1% -21 -7 +210 55.1% +0.64 11–11 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 93.7 +2.58 2000 1923 160.0 — — — — -33 +232 — 65.1% +0.97 13–5 (72%) 7–1 (88%) 106.8 +0.60
29 2004 1695 138.3 +0.28 +2.23 1.082 51.8% -48 +82 +265 52.0% +0.26 10–11 (48%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -0.09 2001 1844 131.6 — — — — -41 +234 +229 58.9% +0.57 4–5 (44%) 4–1 (80%) 94.7 +2.93
30 2005 1680 135.0 +1.49 +2.33 1.159 53.0% -29 +43 +230 49.4% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) 94.8 -0.82 2002 1756 136.7 — — — — +1 +131 +317 52.6% +0.14 7–13 (35%) 7–6 (54%) 91.8 +0.17
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1756 135.1 +0.69 +3.18 1.111 52.4% -58 +154 +313 57.1% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 99.0 -0.01
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1752 150.1 +1.60 +0.47 1.017 49.5% -42 +159 +267 54.9% +0.76 3–7 (30%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.78
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1799 146.1 -0.23 +0.73 0.939 49.0% +2 +89 +156 57.0% +0.49 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 101.4 -1.48
50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1772 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1745 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2069 155.0 +1.11 +2.24 1.144 52.8% +3 -19 +52 57.4% +0.59 109–105 (51%) 60–65 (48%) 93.1 -0.54 — 2263 167.3 +0.69 +2.03 1.051 51.0% -38 +158 +18 67.3% +1.36 138–95 (59%) 79–53 (60%) 103.6 -0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.