H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 1-10
Conchita Martínez holds a 10–1 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 11 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 5–0 on clay and 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2004 Eastbourne fourth round 3-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
10
11 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 22 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| 25 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| 27 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| 29 | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |