H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Daja Bedanova H2H: 1-1
Magdalena Maleeva and Daja Bedanova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on carpet, while Daja Bedanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2002 Tokyo third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2002* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-4 6-4 | Daja Bedanova | Match data |
| Aug 13, 2001 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Daja Bedanova | 6-4 7-6(4) | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Daja Bedanova | #998 | #16 | 1,323 | 1,801 | 64 | 71 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Daja Bedanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #295 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,688 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #28 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #37 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #155 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #295 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |