H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 5-2

Magdalena Maleeva holds a 5–2 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Denisa Chladkova leads 2–1 on clay, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2004 Wimbledon third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Magdalena Maleeva #24 7-5 6-3 Denisa Chladkova #69 Match data
Jan 8, 2004* Gold Coast WTA 250 R32 Hard Magdalena Maleeva #28 6-1 6-1 Denisa Chladkova #41 Match data
May 7, 2003* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Denisa Chladkova #35 6-7(1) 6-1 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #14 Match data
Sep 27, 2001* Leipzig WTA 500 R32 Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #16 6-3 6-3 Denisa Chladkova #42 Match data
Jun 1, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Magdalena Maleeva #64 7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #42 Match data
Nov 20, 1999* Pattaya WTA 250 SF Hard Magdalena Maleeva #131 7-6 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #59 Match data
May 21, 1999* Strasbourg WTA 500 R16 Clay Denisa Chladkova #95 6-4 2-6 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #282 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,740 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Denisa Chladkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,576 0 0
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,440 0 0
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,646 0 0
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,645 0 0
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,661 0 0
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,642 0 0
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,666 0 0
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,699 0 0
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 — — — — — — —