H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 5-2

Magdalena Maleeva holds a 5–2 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Denisa Chladkova leads 2–1 on clay, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2004 Wimbledon round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
5 – 2
7 main draw meetings
Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magdalena Maleeva #24 7-5 6-3 Denisa Chladkova #69 Match data Jun 27, 2004* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Magdalena Maleeva #28 6-1 6-1 Denisa Chladkova #41 Match data Jan 8, 2004* R32 Gold Coast Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Denisa Chladkova #35 6-7(1) 6-1 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #14 Match data May 7, 2003* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Magdalena Maleeva #16 6-3 6-3 Denisa Chladkova #42 Match data Sep 27, 2001* R32 Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Magdalena Maleeva #64 7-6(5) 2-6 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #42 Match data Jun 1, 2000* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Magdalena Maleeva #131 7-6 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #59 Match data Nov 20, 1999* SF Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Denisa Chladkova #95 6-4 2-6 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva Match data May 21, 1999* R16 Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,069 389 275 58.6% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,729 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Denisa Chladkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,717 0 0 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0
17 1992 30–15 66.7% #20 1,926 0 1 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,966 0 1 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,575 0 0
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,989 0 3 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,439 0 0
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,047 0 6 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,636 0 0
21 1996 20–16 55.6% #19 1,924 0 6 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,643 0 0
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,759 0 6 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,651 0 0
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,721 0 6 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,638 0 0
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,741 0 7 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,665 0 0
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,697 0 0
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,850 0 8 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,856 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2004 28–25 52.8% #25 1,695 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,679 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Denisa Chladkova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1992 8 3 11 72.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 1996 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1994 10 4 14 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 1 14 92.9% 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 21 4 25 84.0% 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2000 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 5 0 5 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
25 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 12 15 27 44.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 9 11 20 45.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 117 250 53.2% 105 74 179 58.7% 41 25 66 62.1% 110 59 169 65.1% — 47 60 107 43.9% 60 68 128 46.9% 12 16 28 42.9% 10 21 31 32.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Denisa Chladkova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1498 109.9 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1655 130.9 — — — — -41 -10 — 52.2% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1718 138.5 — — — — -25 -8 — 52.7% +0.09 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.21 1995 1507 99.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — — — +0.06
17 1992 1926 159.6 — — — — -35 -68 — 66.0% +1.12 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) — -1.14 1996 1578 111.0 — — — — +7 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 — — -0.27
18 1993 1967 161.1 — — — — -31 -6 -321 67.9% +1.40 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.36 1997 1575 112.6 — — — — -43 -13 +99 41.2% -0.60 4–6 (40%) 5–8 (38%) — +1.28
19 1994 1989 153.6 — — — — +43 -121 — 72.0% +1.70 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) — +1.01 1998 1439 95.8 — — — — +46 +12 +174 22.4% -1.92 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.23
20 1995 2047 157.5 — — — — +24 -68 — 67.6% +1.06 14–3 (82%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.64 1999 1636 129.9 — — — — -59 -17 — 52.1% +0.23 4–3 (57%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.19
21 1996 1924 151.7 — — — — +52 +67 -275 57.0% +0.65 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.38 2000 1643 131.0 — — — — -12 -10 — 47.6% -0.17 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.37
22 1997 1759 148.3 — — — — +60 +169 -47 50.5% +0.23 6–7 (46%) 1–6 (14%) — +1.32 2001 1651 135.1 — — — — -37 +64 — 46.3% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 2–4 (33%) — -2.05
23 1998 1722 124.2 — — — — +36 — — 39.3% -0.82 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.80 2002 1638 123.6 — — — — -60 +75 — 45.5% -0.25 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.33
24 1999 1741 133.4 — — — — +31 +100 +8 60.0% +1.06 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.19 2003 1665 133.0 -0.58 +0.63 0.946 49.5% 0 +6 — 50.6% +0.14 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.29
25 2000 1813 151.1 — — — — +22 -37 -64 51.3% +0.37 5–10 (33%) 6–9 (40%) — -2.93 2004 1697 124.8 +0.92 -0.86 1.000 50.1% -47 +20 -148 48.9% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.58
26 2001 1851 153.2 — — — — +18 -62 -53 56.2% +0.37 12–9 (57%) 6–5 (55%) — -2.14 2005 1553 111.2 -1.78 -1.80 0.740 43.5% +28 +36 +9 28.6% -1.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.90
27 2002 1856 143.5 — — — — +7 -111 +10 57.2% +0.37 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1747 136.2 +1.69 +2.10 1.218 54.1% -21 -7 +210 55.1% +0.64 11–11 (50%) 3–6 (33%) — +2.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1695 138.3 +0.28 +2.23 1.082 51.8% -48 +82 +265 52.0% +0.26 10–11 (48%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1680 135.0 +1.49 +2.33 1.159 53.0% -29 +43 +230 49.4% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2069 155.0 +1.11 +2.24 1.144 52.8% +3 -19 +52 57.4% +0.59 109–105 (51%) 60–65 (48%) 93.1 -0.54 — 1729 128.6 -0.37 -0.69 0.894 47.9% -20 +20 +31 44.3% -0.38 38–43 (47%) 28–37 (43%) 96.0 -0.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.