H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Florencia Labat H2H: 1-2

Florencia Labat holds a 2–1 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 2000 Hilton Head second round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Florencia Labat
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 19, 2000* Hilton Head WTA 1000 R64 Clay Florencia Labat #87 6-3 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #60 Match data
Jan 8, 1994* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Hard Florencia Labat #51 (w/o) Magdalena Maleeva #16 Match data
May 30, 1990* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Magdalena Maleeva #128 6-7(3) 6-4 6-3 Florencia Labat #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,875 190 181 51.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1992 18–16 52.9% #52 1,736 0 0
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,764 0 0
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,793 0 0
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,783 0 0
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1996 24–17 58.5% #42 1,767 0 0
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 2000 8–9 47.1% #106 1,624 0 0
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 — — — — — — —