H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 2-0
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–0 lead over Ginger Helgeson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1997 Wimbledon second round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1997* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Magdalena Maleeva | 7-5 7-5 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| May 14, 1993* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Magdalena Maleeva | 7-5 6-1 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Magdalena Maleeva | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |