H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Iva Majoli H2H: 1-3
Iva Majoli holds a 3–1 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Iva Majoli leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2002 Miami second round 6-1 5-7 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2002* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-1 5-7 6-0 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Feb 27, 1998* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Iva Majoli | 6-1 6-1 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1996* | Paris | WTA 500 | SF | Clay | Iva Majoli | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1994* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Iva Majoli | 5-7 6-4 6-2 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |