H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-1
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–0 on carpet, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1995 Leipzig fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1995* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Magdalena Maleeva | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1995* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-1 6-2 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Jan 3, 1991* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 6-1 6-2 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Magdalena Maleeva | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |