H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 1-1

Magdalena Maleeva and Leila Meskhi are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on carpet, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1993 Wimbledon round of 128 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Leila Meskhi
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magdalena Maleeva #11 6-2 6-2 Leila Meskhi #32 Match data Jun 23, 1993* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Leila Meskhi #19 6-2 6-1 Magdalena Maleeva #74 Match data Oct 5, 1990* R16 Moscow Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,069 389 275 58.6% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 1,987 193 121 61.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Leila Meskhi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1992 30–15 66.7% #20 1,926 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,966 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,989 0 3 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,047 0 6 1988 18–18 50.0% #46 1,696 0 0
21 1996 20–16 55.6% #19 1,924 0 6 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,759 0 6 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,721 0 6 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,936 0 4
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,741 0 7 1992 26–16 61.9% #22 1,928 0 4
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,871 0 4
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,850 0 8 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,842 0 4
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,856 0 9 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,832 0 5
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,746 0 5
29 2004 28–25 52.8% #25 1,695 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,679 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Leila Meskhi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 8 3 11 72.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 10 4 14 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 1 14 92.9% 1987 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 21 4 25 84.0% 1988 15 12 27 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1990 19 5 24 79.2% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1999 5 0 5 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 9 6 15 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1995 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2004 12 15 27 44.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 9 11 20 45.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 117 250 53.2% 105 74 179 58.7% 41 25 66 62.1% 110 59 169 65.1% — 101 58 159 63.5% 64 39 103 62.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 25 16 41 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Leila Meskhi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1498 109.9 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1655 130.9 — — — — -41 -10 — 52.2% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1718 138.5 — — — — -25 -8 — 52.7% +0.09 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 101.2 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 1926 159.6 — — — — -35 -68 — 66.0% +1.12 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 102.9 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 1967 161.1 — — — — -31 -6 -321 67.9% +1.40 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 101.2 +1.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 1989 153.6 — — — — +43 -121 — 72.0% +1.70 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.9 +1.01 1987 1656 134.5 — — — — +27 -63 — 64.1% +1.05 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.80
20 1995 2047 157.5 — — — — +24 -68 — 67.6% +1.06 14–3 (82%) 5–3 (63%) 107.8 -0.64 1988 1696 129.7 — — — — +32 — -166 49.4% -0.23 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +0.65
21 1996 1924 151.7 — — — — +52 +67 -275 57.0% +0.65 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 92.7 -1.38 1989 1795 139.4 — — — — +11 -135 — 59.2% +0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–0 (100%) 108.0 -1.90
22 1997 1759 148.3 — — — — +60 +169 -47 50.5% +0.23 6–7 (46%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.32 1990 1928 151.0 — — — — +5 -112 -373 66.4% +1.63 10–3 (77%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +1.11
23 1998 1722 124.2 — — — — +36 — — 39.3% -0.82 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.80 1991 1937 151.3 — — — — -20 +20 — 62.6% +0.74 9–4 (69%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +0.25
24 1999 1741 133.4 — — — — +31 +100 +8 60.0% +1.06 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 96.9 +0.19 1992 1928 157.9 — — — — -26 +60 — 61.5% +1.16 7–4 (64%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -1.71
25 2000 1813 151.1 — — — — +22 -37 -64 51.3% +0.37 5–10 (33%) 6–9 (40%) 92.4 -2.93 1993 1872 148.4 — — — — -2 +90 — 55.3% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 -1.93
26 2001 1851 153.2 — — — — +18 -62 -53 56.2% +0.37 12–9 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -2.14 1994 1843 148.6 — — — — -3 +108 — 55.2% +0.72 9–4 (69%) 3–3 (50%) 102.8 +0.52
27 2002 1856 143.5 — — — — +7 -111 +10 57.2% +0.37 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 99.4 -1.27 1995 1833 120.0 — — — — 0 — — 73.3% +1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +0.23
28 2003 1747 136.2 +1.69 +2.10 1.218 54.1% -21 -7 +210 55.1% +0.64 11–11 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 93.7 +2.58 1996 1747 89.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.63 — — — -0.21
29 2004 1695 138.3 +0.28 +2.23 1.082 51.8% -48 +82 +265 52.0% +0.26 10–11 (48%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1680 135.0 +1.49 +2.33 1.159 53.0% -29 +43 +230 49.4% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) 94.8 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2069 155.0 +1.11 +2.24 1.144 52.8% +3 -19 +52 57.4% +0.59 109–105 (51%) 60–65 (48%) 93.1 -0.54 — 1987 152.8 — — — — +2 0 -270 58.9% +0.70 52–30 (63%) 28–33 (46%) 103.7 -0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.