H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 2-1

Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1995 Oakland fourth round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 3, 1995* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #7 6-1 6-4 Lori Mcneil #64 Match data
Aug 14, 1993* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 QF Hard Lori Mcneil #23 1-6 7-6 7-5 Magdalena Maleeva #11 Match data
Jun 25, 1993* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Magdalena Maleeva #11 7-6 6-4 Lori Mcneil #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11