H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 4–2 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 3–0 on carpet, while Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1995 Leipzig semifinal 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | 6-3 6-1 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Sep 30, 1995* | SF | Leipzig | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 6-1 3-1 (ret.) | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Oct 7, 1994* | R16 | Zurich | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Carpet |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 6-4 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Feb 11, 1994* | R16 | Chicago | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 7-5 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data | Sep 1, 1993* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-2 7-5 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data | Mar 17, 1991* | R64 | Key Biscayne | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 5-7 6-0 6-0 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data | Apr 26, 1990* | R32 | Singapore Tennis Open | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,069 | 389 | 275 | 58.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,850 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Magdalena Maleeva | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,926 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,966 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,989 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,047 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #19 | 1,924 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,721 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,741 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,850 | 0 | 8 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,856 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #25 | 1,695 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Magdalena Maleeva | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1984 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1991 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1985 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1986 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1993 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1987 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 1994 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 13 | 1 | 14 | 92.9% | 1988 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 36.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1995 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | — | — | — | — | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0% | 1989 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 1996 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1990 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1997 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1991 | 16 | 11 | 27 | 59.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 1998 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1992 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1999 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1993 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 2000 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1994 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 2001 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 1995 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 2002 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 1996 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 2003 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1997 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 133 | 117 | 250 | 53.2% | 105 | 74 | 179 | 58.7% | 41 | 25 | 66 | 62.1% | 110 | 59 | 169 | 65.1% | Career | 125 | 129 | 254 | 49.2% | 7 | 20 | 27 | 25.9% | 11 | 20 | 31 | 35.5% | 33 | 33 | 66 | 50.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Magdalena Maleeva | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1989 | 1498 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.17 | 1983 | 1492 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.02 |
| 1990 | 1655 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -10 | — | 52.2% | +0.11 | 4–2 (67%) | 0–2 | — | -0.02 | 1984 | 1478 | 96.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.29 |
| 1991 | 1718 | 138.5 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -8 | — | 52.7% | +0.09 | 5–7 (42%) | 4–2 (67%) | 101.2 | -0.21 | 1985 | 1542 | 112.3 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 63.2% | +0.89 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 1992 | 1926 | 159.6 | — | — | — | — | -35 | -68 | — | 66.0% | +1.12 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–1 (80%) | 102.9 | -1.14 | 1986 | 1683 | 123.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.34 | 8–2 (80%) | 5–1 (83%) | — | +1.30 |
| 1993 | 1967 | 161.1 | — | — | — | — | -31 | -6 | -321 | 67.9% | +1.40 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–4 (64%) | 101.2 | +1.36 | 1987 | 1659 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | -85 | 41.9% | -0.77 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.83 |
| 1994 | 1989 | 153.6 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -121 | — | 72.0% | +1.70 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.9 | +1.01 | 1988 | 1587 | 119.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | -37 | 37.3% | -1.03 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.4 | -1.05 |
| 1995 | 2047 | 157.5 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -68 | — | 67.6% | +1.06 | 14–3 (82%) | 5–3 (63%) | 107.8 | -0.64 | 1989 | 1592 | 119.9 | — | — | — | — | -6 | — | — | 44.1% | -0.25 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.6 | +2.41 |
| 1996 | 1924 | 151.7 | — | — | — | — | +52 | +67 | -275 | 57.0% | +0.65 | 4–7 (36%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.7 | -1.38 | 1990 | 1746 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -257 | — | 51.7% | +0.10 | 7–10 (41%) | 6–4 (60%) | 103.1 | -0.70 |
| 1997 | 1759 | 148.3 | — | — | — | — | +60 | +169 | -47 | 50.5% | +0.23 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–6 (14%) | 91.0 | +1.32 | 1991 | 1740 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -243 | -169 | 48.9% | -0.13 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 103.3 | +0.98 |
| 1998 | 1722 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 39.3% | -0.82 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–1 | — | +0.80 | 1992 | 1697 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | -146 | 48.5% | 0.00 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.1 | +0.32 |
| 1999 | 1741 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | +31 | +100 | +8 | 60.0% | +1.06 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–1 (80%) | 96.9 | +0.19 | 1993 | 1749 | 139.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -270 | -150 | 51.6% | +0.31 | 8–5 (62%) | 2–2 (50%) | 101.6 | -0.37 |
| 2000 | 1813 | 151.1 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -37 | -64 | 51.3% | +0.37 | 5–10 (33%) | 6–9 (40%) | 92.4 | -2.93 | 1994 | 1773 | 143.7 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -260 | -181 | 48.5% | -0.08 | 9–6 (60%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | -0.29 |
| 2001 | 1851 | 153.2 | — | — | — | — | +18 | -62 | -53 | 56.2% | +0.37 | 12–9 (57%) | 6–5 (55%) | 103.3 | -2.14 | 1995 | 1788 | 149.0 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -292 | — | 54.1% | +0.31 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–2 (60%) | 101.2 | +0.06 |
| 2002 | 1856 | 143.5 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -111 | +10 | 57.2% | +0.37 | 11–9 (55%) | 7–5 (58%) | 99.4 | -1.27 | 1996 | 1666 | 124.9 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -192 | — | 31.6% | -1.28 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | +0.43 |
| 2003 | 1747 | 136.2 | +1.69 | +2.10 | 1.218 | 54.1% | -21 | -7 | +210 | 55.1% | +0.64 | 11–11 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 93.7 | +2.58 | 1997 | 1673 | 119.1 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | — | 52.6% | +0.37 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–1 | — | -0.07 |
| 2004 | 1695 | 138.3 | +0.28 | +2.23 | 1.082 | 51.8% | -48 | +82 | +265 | 52.0% | +0.26 | 10–11 (48%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.6 | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1680 | 135.0 | +1.49 | +2.33 | 1.159 | 53.0% | -29 | +43 | +230 | 49.4% | +0.12 | 2–7 (22%) | 4–4 (50%) | 94.8 | -0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2069 | 155.0 | +1.11 | +2.24 | 1.144 | 52.8% | +3 | -19 | +52 | 57.4% | +0.59 | 109–105 (51%) | 60–65 (48%) | 93.1 | -0.54 | Career | 1850 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -251 | -124 | 47.3% | -0.20 | 63–57 (53%) | 39–25 (61%) | 108.6 | +0.74 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | 8 | 4 | 12 | Sep 1, 2005 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 4 | 7 | 11 | May 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 1 | 10 | 11 | Jun 18, 2004 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 8 | 3 | 11 | Feb 6, 2004 | H2H |
| Chanda Rubin | 8 | 2 | 10 | Feb 8, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | 3 | 4 | 7 | Feb 10, 1995 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 2 | 4 | 6 | May 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 17, 1996 | H2H |