H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Martina Navratilova H2H: 2-4

Martina Navratilova holds a 4–2 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Martina Navratilova leads 3–1 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1994 Chicago quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Martina Navratilova
USA Age 69 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 1994* Chicago WTA 250 QF Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #13 6-4 6-3 Martina Navratilova #3 Match data
Oct 9, 1993* Zurich WTA 1000 SF Carpet Martina Navratilova #3 6-3 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #15 Match data
Oct 10, 1992* Zurich WTA 250 QF Carpet Martina Navratilova #5 6-2 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #20 Match data
Sep 3, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Magdalena Maleeva #27 6-4 0-6 6-3 Martina Navratilova #3 Match data
Jun 24, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Martina Navratilova #4 6-2 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #31 Match data
Feb 2, 1992* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 250 SF Carpet Martina Navratilova #4 6-2 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Martina Navratilova #395 #1 290 2,664 1,427 227 86.3% 18 8 8 15 120 168

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Martina Navratilova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1972 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 1
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1973 20–17 54.1% — 1,761 0 2
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1974 39–20 66.1% — 1,975 0 4
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1975 81–21 79.4% — 2,218 0 7
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1976 41–16 71.9% — 2,153 0 9
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1977 67–15 81.7% — 2,243 0 15
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1978 78–9 89.7% — 2,420 1 26
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1979 91–12 88.3% — 2,428 2 36
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1980 86–12 87.8% — 2,344 2 47
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1981 90–15 85.7% — 2,407 3 57
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1982 85–3 96.6% — 2,521 5 72
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 1983 84–1 98.8% — 2,622 8 88
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 1984 78–2 97.5% #1 2,633 11 101
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 1985 84–5 94.4% #1 2,583 13 113
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 1986 84–3 96.6% #1 2,626 15 126
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 1987 56–8 87.5% #2 2,523 17 130
31 — — — — — — — 1988 70–7 90.9% #2 2,452 17 139
32 — — — — — — — 1989 68–8 89.5% #2 2,393 17 147
33 — — — — — — — 1990 52–7 88.1% #3 2,306 18 153
34 — — — — — — — 1991 53–9 85.5% #4 2,316 18 158
35 — — — — — — — 1992 38–8 82.6% #5 2,326 18 162
36 — — — — — — — 1993 46–8 85.2% #3 2,264 18 167
37 — — — — — — — 1994 33–14 70.2% #8 2,073 18 168
45 — — — — — — — 2002 1–1 50.0% — 2,051 18 168
47 — — — — — — — 2004 1–4 20.0% #388 1,940 18 168
48 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #395 1,910 18 168