H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-3

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 3–1 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1997 Canadian Open quarterfinal 6-2 6-7 6-4.

BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 1997* Canadian Open WTA 1000 QF Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #13 6-2 6-7 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #43 Match data
Mar 23, 1997* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #12 3-6 6-2 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #21 Match data
Nov 4, 1995* Oakland WTA 250 SF Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #7 5-7 6-2 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #11 Match data
Oct 5, 1991* Milan WTA 250 QF Carpet Mary Joe Fernandez #7 5-7 6-3 6-4 Magdalena Maleeva #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1984 0–2 0.0% 1,475 0 0
13 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10