H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Mary Pierce H2H: 3-2

Magdalena Maleeva holds a 3–2 lead over Mary Pierce in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2004 Antwerp third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 2004* Antwerp WTA 500 R32 Hard Magdalena Maleeva #21 6-4 6-4 Mary Pierce #27 Match data
Oct 11, 2003* Filderstadt WTA 500 QF Hard Mary Pierce #48 7-5 7-6(6) Magdalena Maleeva #21 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Pierce #4 7-5 2-6 6-1 Magdalena Maleeva #37 Match data
May 20, 1995* German Open WTA 1000 QF Clay Magdalena Maleeva #9 7-6 4-6 6-4 Mary Pierce #3 Match data
Feb 5, 1995* Tokyo WTA 1000 QF Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #11 6-3 1-6 6-3 Mary Pierce #3 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 — — — — — — — 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18