H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 2-1
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2004 Roland Garros third round 6-3 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-3 7-6(3) | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2003* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-4 6-4 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2001* | Paris | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Magdalena Maleeva | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |