H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 3-2

Magdalena Maleeva holds a 3–2 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 2–1 on grass, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2002 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 7-6(3) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2002 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Magdalena Maleeva #20 7-6(3) 7-5 Miriam Oremans #128 Match data
Jun 29, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Miriam Oremans #111 1-6 7-5 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #63 Match data
Jun 20, 1997* Rosmalen WTA 250 R16 Grass Miriam Oremans #78 6-4 7-5 Magdalena Maleeva #35 Match data
Jun 2, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Magdalena Maleeva #13 6-2 6-1 Miriam Oremans #47 Match data
Feb 18, 1996* Paris WTA 500 QF Clay Magdalena Maleeva #7 6-3 6-4 Miriam Oremans #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 — — — — — — —