H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 3–2 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 2–1 on grass, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2002 Libéma Open round of 16 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Miriam Oremans | Match data | Jun 21, 2002* | R16 | Libéma Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
| Miriam Oremans | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data | Jun 29, 2000* | R64 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Miriam Oremans | 6-4 7-5 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data | Jun 20, 1997* | R16 | Rosmalen | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Grass |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 6-2 6-1 | Miriam Oremans | Match data | Jun 2, 1996* | R32 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 6-3 6-4 | Miriam Oremans | Match data | Feb 18, 1996* | QF | Paris | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,069 | 389 | 275 | 58.6% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,808 | 162 | 182 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,926 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,966 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,989 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,047 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #19 | 1,924 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,721 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,741 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,850 | 0 | 8 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,856 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #64 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #25 | 1,695 | 0 | 10 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,679 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1990 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 16 | 6 | 22 | 72.7% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 13 | 1 | 14 | 92.9% | 1992 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 20 | 1995 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | — | — | — | — | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0% | 1993 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1996 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1994 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 22 | 1997 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 1995 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1998 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1996 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 24 | 1999 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1997 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 25 | 2000 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1998 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2001 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 15 | 5 | 20 | 75.0% | 1999 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 2002 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 2000 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2001 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2002 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 133 | 117 | 250 | 53.2% | 105 | 74 | 179 | 58.7% | 41 | 25 | 66 | 62.1% | 110 | 59 | 169 | 65.1% | — | 61 | 85 | 146 | 41.8% | 28 | 43 | 71 | 39.4% | 53 | 33 | 86 | 61.6% | 20 | 21 | 41 | 48.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1498 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30.0% | -1.50 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 1655 | 130.9 | — | — | — | — | -41 | -10 | — | 52.2% | +0.11 | 4–2 (67%) | 0–2 | — | -0.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 1718 | 138.5 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -8 | — | 52.7% | +0.09 | 5–7 (42%) | 4–2 (67%) | 101.2 | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1992 | 1926 | 159.6 | — | — | — | — | -35 | -68 | — | 66.0% | +1.12 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–1 (80%) | 102.9 | -1.14 | 1990 | 1520 | 110.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.11 |
| 18 | 1993 | 1967 | 161.1 | — | — | — | — | -31 | -6 | -321 | 67.9% | +1.40 | 5–4 (56%) | 7–4 (64%) | 101.2 | +1.36 | 1991 | 1472 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +51 | — | 29.6% | -1.00 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.66 |
| 19 | 1994 | 1989 | 153.6 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -121 | — | 72.0% | +1.70 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–6 (33%) | 96.9 | +1.01 | 1992 | 1532 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +48 | — | -24 | 38.6% | -0.80 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–1 | — | +0.45 |
| 20 | 1995 | 2047 | 157.5 | — | — | — | — | +24 | -68 | — | 67.6% | +1.06 | 14–3 (82%) | 5–3 (63%) | 107.8 | -0.64 | 1993 | 1747 | 146.5 | — | — | — | — | -74 | -220 | +26 | 59.1% | +0.56 | 7–14 (33%) | 4–6 (40%) | 97.4 | +0.65 |
| 21 | 1996 | 1924 | 151.7 | — | — | — | — | +52 | +67 | -275 | 57.0% | +0.65 | 4–7 (36%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.7 | -1.38 | 1994 | 1733 | 131.3 | — | — | — | — | -44 | -192 | +24 | 46.8% | -0.26 | 5–8 (38%) | 5–7 (42%) | 96.7 | +0.41 |
| 22 | 1997 | 1759 | 148.3 | — | — | — | — | +60 | +169 | -47 | 50.5% | +0.23 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–6 (14%) | 91.0 | +1.32 | 1995 | 1769 | 143.9 | — | — | — | — | -10 | -170 | -22 | 50.0% | +0.10 | 6–4 (60%) | 6–7 (46%) | 104.5 | -0.91 |
| 23 | 1998 | 1722 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 39.3% | -0.82 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–1 | — | +0.80 | 1996 | 1714 | 134.9 | — | — | — | — | -34 | -67 | +161 | 48.1% | +0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–5 (44%) | 100.2 | +0.41 |
| 24 | 1999 | 1741 | 133.4 | — | — | — | — | +31 | +100 | +8 | 60.0% | +1.06 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–1 (80%) | 96.9 | +0.19 | 1997 | 1774 | 137.0 | — | — | — | — | -31 | -189 | +117 | 47.9% | +0.10 | 8–7 (53%) | 2–7 (22%) | 99.3 | -1.65 |
| 25 | 2000 | 1813 | 151.1 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -37 | -64 | 51.3% | +0.37 | 5–10 (33%) | 6–9 (40%) | 92.4 | -2.93 | 1998 | 1728 | 120.1 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -132 | +210 | 41.5% | -0.65 | 6–1 (86%) | 5–7 (42%) | 102.7 | -0.25 |
| 26 | 2001 | 1851 | 153.2 | — | — | — | — | +18 | -62 | -53 | 56.2% | +0.37 | 12–9 (57%) | 6–5 (55%) | 103.3 | -2.14 | 1999 | 1628 | 117.1 | — | — | — | — | -17 | -126 | +239 | 34.0% | -1.19 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | -1.78 |
| 27 | 2002 | 1856 | 143.5 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -111 | +10 | 57.2% | +0.37 | 11–9 (55%) | 7–5 (58%) | 99.4 | -1.27 | 2000 | 1711 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | -8 | -186 | +166 | 53.5% | +0.13 | 7–4 (64%) | 4–3 (57%) | 103.0 | +0.23 |
| 28 | 2003 | 1747 | 136.2 | +1.69 | +2.10 | 1.218 | 54.1% | -21 | -7 | +210 | 55.1% | +0.64 | 11–11 (50%) | 3–6 (33%) | 93.7 | +2.58 | 2001 | 1690 | 122.8 | — | — | — | — | -15 | -187 | +242 | 43.3% | -0.55 | 8–3 (73%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.2 | -1.04 |
| 29 | 2004 | 1695 | 138.3 | +0.28 | +2.23 | 1.082 | 51.8% | -48 | +82 | +265 | 52.0% | +0.26 | 10–11 (48%) | 3–6 (33%) | 94.6 | -0.09 | 2002 | 1613 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -157 | +280 | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–2 (33%) | 0–4 (0%) | 93.7 | +0.42 |
| 30 | 2005 | 1680 | 135.0 | +1.49 | +2.33 | 1.159 | 53.0% | -29 | +43 | +230 | 49.4% | +0.12 | 2–7 (22%) | 4–4 (50%) | 94.8 | -0.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2069 | 155.0 | +1.11 | +2.24 | 1.144 | 52.8% | +3 | -19 | +52 | 57.4% | +0.59 | 109–105 (51%) | 60–65 (48%) | 93.1 | -0.54 | — | 1808 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | -26 | -145 | +138 | 46.8% | -0.19 | 59–52 (53%) | 34–51 (40%) | 97.2 | -0.73 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | 8 | 4 | 12 | Sep 1, 2005 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 4 | 7 | 11 | May 11, 2005 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 1 | 10 | 11 | Jun 18, 2004 | H2H |
| Lisa Raymond | 8 | 3 | 11 | Feb 6, 2004 | H2H |
| Chanda Rubin | 8 | 2 | 10 | Feb 8, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabine Appelmans | 3 | 4 | 7 | Jun 10, 1999 | H2H |
| Sandrine Testud | 0 | 6 | 6 | Feb 23, 2001 | H2H |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 2 | 4 | 6 | Aug 22, 2000 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 6 | 6 | Sep 2, 1998 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jun 21, 2002 | H2H |