H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Monica Seles H2H: 1-4

Monica Seles holds a 4–1 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2000 Rome third round 7-5 6-1.

BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 2000* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Monica Seles #7 7-5 6-1 Magdalena Maleeva #62 Match data
Aug 10, 1996* Canadian Open WTA 1000 QF Hard Monica Seles #1 6-4 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #11 Match data
Jun 4, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Monica Seles #1 6-1 6-1 Magdalena Maleeva #13 Match data
May 1, 1993* Hamburg WTA 250 QF Clay Magdalena Maleeva #14 4-6 3-4 (ret.) Monica Seles #1 Match data
May 18, 1990* Berlin WTA 1000 R16 Clay Monica Seles #3 6-2 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #182 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10