H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 2-1
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–1 lead over Natasha Zvereva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1995 German Open semifinal 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 1995* | German Open | WTA 1000 | SF | Clay | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-4 7-6 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1994* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | F | Carpet | Magdalena Maleeva | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Natasha Zvereva | Match data |
| May 31, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-4 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |