H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 2-0

Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–0 lead over Nicole Jagerman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1993 Australian Open round of 128 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Nicole Jagerman
NED Age 59 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Magdalena Maleeva #19 6-2 6-0 Nicole Jagerman #112 Match data Jan 20, 1993* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Magdalena Maleeva #20 6-2 6-2 Nicole Jagerman #103 Match data Jan 7, 1993* R32 Brisbane International Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,069 389 275 58.6% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Nicole Jagerman #685 #43 24 1,735 81 100 44.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Nicole Jagerman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,717 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1992 30–15 66.7% #20 1,926 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,966 0 1 1986 9–4 69.2% #106 1,606 0 0
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,989 0 3 1987 0–10 0.0% #206 1,479 0 0
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,047 0 6 1988 11–10 52.4% #72 1,582 0 0
21 1996 20–16 55.6% #19 1,924 0 6 1989 13–15 46.4% #82 1,658 0 0
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,759 0 6 1990 12–13 48.0% #68 1,698 0 0
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,721 0 6 1991 10–11 47.6% #67 1,690 0 0
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,741 0 7 1992 9–14 39.1% #115 1,632 0 0
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1993 12–11 52.2% #68 1,682 0 0
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,850 0 8 1994 4–11 26.7% #137 1,590 0 0
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,856 0 9 1995 1–1 50.0% #215 1,608 0 0
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 2004 28–25 52.8% #25 1,695 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,679 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Nicole Jagerman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 8 3 11 72.7% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 16 6 22 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1986 — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1994 10 4 14 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 1 14 92.9% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
20 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 21 4 25 84.0% 1988 5 4 9 55.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1997 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1998 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 5 0 5 100.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2000 10 10 20 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1993 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2001 9 12 21 42.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2002 11 11 22 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 14 12 26 53.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 12 15 27 44.4% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 9 11 20 45.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 117 250 53.2% 105 74 179 58.7% 41 25 66 62.1% 110 59 169 65.1% — 21 32 53 39.6% 54 51 105 51.4% 2 10 12 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Nicole Jagerman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1989 1498 109.9 — — — — — — — 30.0% -1.50 1–1 — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1990 1655 130.9 — — — — -41 -10 — 52.2% +0.11 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1991 1718 138.5 — — — — -25 -8 — 52.7% +0.09 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 101.2 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1992 1926 159.6 — — — — -35 -68 — 66.0% +1.12 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 102.9 -1.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 1967 161.1 — — — — -31 -6 -321 67.9% +1.40 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 101.2 +1.36 1986 1607 116.3 — — — — 0 +33 — 63.3% +0.73 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 106.5 +1.74
19 1994 1989 153.6 — — — — +43 -121 — 72.0% +1.70 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.9 +1.01 1987 1480 96.7 — — — — — +55 +35 9.1% -2.55 0–2 2–2 (50%) — +0.44
20 1995 2047 157.5 — — — — +24 -68 — 67.6% +1.06 14–3 (82%) 5–3 (63%) 107.8 -0.64 1988 1582 121.0 — — — — +4 +31 — 50.0% -0.04 3–1 (75%) 4–1 (80%) 106.2 +0.50
21 1996 1924 151.7 — — — — +52 +67 -275 57.0% +0.65 4–7 (36%) 2–4 (33%) 92.7 -1.38 1989 1659 133.0 — — — — -114 +87 — 45.5% -0.17 6–6 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 104.0 +0.22
22 1997 1759 148.3 — — — — +60 +169 -47 50.5% +0.23 6–7 (46%) 1–6 (14%) 91.0 +1.32 1990 1698 130.7 — — — — -75 +4 — 49.1% -0.57 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — -1.74
23 1998 1722 124.2 — — — — +36 — — 39.3% -0.82 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — +0.80 1991 1691 126.0 — — — — — +73 -152 42.2% -0.56 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.09
24 1999 1741 133.4 — — — — +31 +100 +8 60.0% +1.06 4–6 (40%) 4–1 (80%) 96.9 +0.19 1992 1632 128.5 — — — — -36 +72 — 42.0% -0.38 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 97.4 -0.22
25 2000 1813 151.1 — — — — +22 -37 -64 51.3% +0.37 5–10 (33%) 6–9 (40%) 92.4 -2.93 1993 1683 131.2 — — — — -33 +15 — 51.0% +0.12 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.7 +0.14
26 2001 1851 153.2 — — — — +18 -62 -53 56.2% +0.37 12–9 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -2.14 1994 1590 112.1 — — — — +10 +71 — 30.3% -1.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.31
27 2002 1856 143.5 — — — — +7 -111 +10 57.2% +0.37 11–9 (55%) 7–5 (58%) 99.4 -1.27 1995 1608 114.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — -0.38
28 2003 1747 136.2 +1.69 +2.10 1.218 54.1% -21 -7 +210 55.1% +0.64 11–11 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 93.7 +2.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1695 138.3 +0.28 +2.23 1.082 51.8% -48 +82 +265 52.0% +0.26 10–11 (48%) 3–6 (33%) 94.6 -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1680 135.0 +1.49 +2.33 1.159 53.0% -29 +43 +230 49.4% +0.12 2–7 (22%) 4–4 (50%) 94.8 -0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2069 155.0 +1.11 +2.24 1.144 52.8% +3 -19 +52 57.4% +0.59 109–105 (51%) 60–65 (48%) 93.1 -0.54 — 1736 132.3 — — — — -41 +52 -59 44.5% -0.39 21–21 (50%) 23–15 (61%) 107.3 -0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.