H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 3-3

Magdalena Maleeva and Sabine Appelmans are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 2–1 on carpet, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 2000 Filderstadt third round 6-4 5-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Sabine Appelmans
BEL Age 54 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 5, 2000* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Magdalena Maleeva #27 6-4 5-7 7-5 Sabine Appelmans #34 Match data
Feb 22, 1998* Hanover WTA 250 R16 Carpet Sabine Appelmans #24 7-5 6-3 Magdalena Maleeva #29 Match data
Jan 14, 1998* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Magdalena Maleeva #34 6-1 1-6 6-3 Sabine Appelmans #16 Match data
Feb 13, 1997* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Sabine Appelmans #18 7-5 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #21 Match data
Oct 23, 1992* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Magdalena Maleeva #21 6-4 6-1 Sabine Appelmans #20 Match data
Feb 10, 1990* Wellington WTA 250 QF Hard Sabine Appelmans #88 6-1 7-5 Magdalena Maleeva #217 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Sabine Appelmans #94 #16 1,502 1,923 279 202 58.0% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Sabine Appelmans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% #283 1,502 0 0
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1988 1–3 25.0% #196 1,498 0 0
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1989 2–5 28.6% #144 1,468 0 0
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1990 21–12 63.6% #22 1,679 0 0
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1991 34–14 70.8% #18 1,873 0 2
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1992 26–15 63.4% #26 1,875 0 3
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1993 19–15 55.9% #36 1,828 0 3
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1994 29–16 64.4% #27 1,821 0 5
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 1995 24–17 58.5% #31 1,809 0 6
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 1996 26–16 61.9% #21 1,843 0 7
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 1997 37–26 58.7% #16 1,856 0 7
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 1998 13–18 41.9% #48 1,721 0 7
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 1999 25–21 54.3% #30 1,777 0 7
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2000 20–22 47.6% #49 1,692 0 7
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 2001 1–1 50.0% #94 1,685 0 7
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 — — — — — — —