H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Magdalena Maleeva vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 2-4

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 4–2 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2004 Birmingham fourth round 0-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Magdalena Maleeva
BUL Age 51 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 2004* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #58 0-6 6-4 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #21 Match data
Aug 21, 2003* New Haven WTA 500 R32 Hard Magdalena Maleeva #11 5-7 6-4 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #42 Match data
May 9, 2002* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Magdalena Maleeva #26 6-4 6-0 Tamarine Tanasugarn #20 Match data
Feb 2, 2002* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Tamarine Tanasugarn #26 6-3 2-6 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #14 Match data
Jan 17, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #30 7-6(2) 7-5 Magdalena Maleeva #27 Match data
Sep 18, 1997* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #41 0-6 6-4 6-2 Magdalena Maleeva #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Magdalena Maleeva #401 #4 1,834 2,083 384 272 58.5% 0 2 0 2 6 10
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Magdalena Maleeva Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1989 1–3 25.0% #216 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1990 12–10 54.5% #72 1,654 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1991 17–15 53.1% #38 1,718 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1992 28–14 66.7% #20 1,908 0 1 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1993 36–16 69.2% #16 1,962 0 1 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1994 31–12 72.1% #11 1,980 0 3 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1995 37–12 75.5% #6 2,029 0 6 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 1996 18–15 54.5% #19 1,908 0 6 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 1997 21–22 48.8% #36 1,746 0 6 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 1998 5–7 41.7% #116 1,713 0 6 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 1999 12–8 60.0% #76 1,737 0 7 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2000 25–25 50.0% #23 1,813 0 7 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2001 35–24 59.3% #16 1,849 0 8 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2002 35–24 59.3% #14 1,855 0 9 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2003 27–21 56.2% #30 1,746 0 10 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2004 27–24 52.9% #25 1,710 0 10 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2005 17–20 45.9% #53 1,682 0 10 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4