H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magdalena Maleeva vs Zina Garrison H2H: 2-1
Magdalena Maleeva holds a 2–1 lead over Zina Garrison in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Magdalena Maleeva leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magdalena Maleeva won the 1995 Zurich fourth round 3-6 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 1995* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Magdalena Maleeva | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1992* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Magdalena Maleeva | 6-4 6-4 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Aug 19, 1991 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Zina Garrison | 6-3 2-6 6-1 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magdalena Maleeva | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |