H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Magui Serna vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 1-3
Barbara Rittner holds a 3–1 lead over Magui Serna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Barbara Rittner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magui Serna won the 2001 Estoril third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2001* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Magui Serna | 6-3 6-4 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2000* | Gold Coast | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Barbara Rittner | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| May 26, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Barbara Rittner | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1999* | Hanover | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Rittner | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Magui Serna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magui Serna | Barbara Rittner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |