H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Magui Serna vs Iva Majoli H2H: 2-1
Magui Serna holds a 2–1 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Magui Serna leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magui Serna won the 2002 Madrid third round 4-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2002* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Magui Serna | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Feb 9, 2001* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Magui Serna | 6-4 6-2 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| May 2, 1997* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Iva Majoli | 6-4 7-5 | Magui Serna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magui Serna | Iva Majoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 |
| 21 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 |
| 22 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 |
| 23 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 |
| 24 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 |
| 25 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 |