H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Magui Serna vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 0-1
Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 1–0 lead over Magui Serna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Joe Fernandez won the 1999 Sydney third round 6-7 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 1999* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Mary Joe Fernandez | 6-7 6-2 6-1 | Magui Serna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mary Joe Fernandez | #136 | #4 | 2,114 | 2,191 | 409 | 192 | 68.1% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magui Serna | Mary Joe Fernandez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #20 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 22–11 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #12 | 1,977 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,123 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 47–18 | 72.3% | #8 | 2,062 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #6 | 2,108 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #7 | 2,054 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #14 | 1,975 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #8 | 2,038 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #16 | 1,926 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #10 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,932 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #38 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,869 | 0 | 7 |