H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Magui Serna vs Miho Saeki H2H: 2-2
Magui Serna and Miho Saeki are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Magui Serna leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Miho Saeki leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Miho Saeki won the 1999 Indian Wells second round 4-6 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1999* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Miho Saeki | 4-6 7-6 6-2 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1998* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Miho Saeki | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1997* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Magui Serna | 7-6 4-6 6-3 | Miho Saeki | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1997* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Magui Serna | 6-3 6-7(6) 7-5 | Miho Saeki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Miho Saeki | #884 | #56 | 461 | 1,579 | 26 | 57 | 31.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magui Serna | Miho Saeki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #76 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #119 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |