H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Magui Serna vs Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor H2H: 2-2
Magui Serna and Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 2000 Montreal second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2000* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 6-2 6-2 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2000* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | 6-4 6-3 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1999* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Magui Serna | 6-4 7-6(2) | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1997* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Magui Serna | 6-2 6-0 | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | #739 | #29 | 917 | 1,771 | 109 | 123 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Magui Serna | Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #122 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #94 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #57 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #36 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #160 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |