H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Maja Matevzic vs Rachel Mcquillan H2H: 1-0
Maja Matevzic holds a 1–0 lead over Rachel Mcquillan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maja Matevzic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maja Matevzic won the 2002 Doha fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 46
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2002* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Maja Matevzic | 6-3 6-3 | Rachel Mcquillan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maja Matevzic | #1,250 | #38 | 840 | 1,711 | 45 | 50 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rachel Mcquillan | #971 | #28 | 582 | 1,826 | 163 | 195 | 45.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maja Matevzic | Rachel Mcquillan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #159 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #79 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #115 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #61 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #186 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #649 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #185 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #79 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #178 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #355 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |