H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Maja Zivec Skulj holds a 2–0 lead over Katia Piccolini in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maja Zivec Skulj leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Maja Zivec Skulj won the 1993 Italian Open round of 64 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maja Zivec Skulj | 6-3 6-0 | Katia Piccolini | Match data | May 5, 1993* | R64 | Italian Open | Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 | Clay |
| Maja Zivec Skulj | 6-3 6-3 | Katia Piccolini | Match data | Jul 23, 1992* | R32 | San Marino | Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maja Zivec Skulj | — | — | — | 1,500 | 11 | 30 | 26.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Katia Piccolini | #845 | #37 | 40 | 1,693 | 29 | 40 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Maja Zivec Skulj | Katia Piccolini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #180 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #47 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,422 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1993 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,549 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Maja Zivec Skulj | Katia Piccolini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1991 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1994 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 4 | 12 | 16 | 25.0% | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 27 | 33 | 60 | 45.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Maja Zivec Skulj | Katia Piccolini | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1989 | 1485 | 97.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1537 | 109.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | 63.6% | +0.73 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.67 |
| 17 | 1991 | 1449 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | — | 14.3% | -2.43 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.29 | 1990 | 1668 | 127.8 | — | — | — | — | -88 | +43 | — | 61.1% | +0.63 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–2 (67%) | 100.8 | +1.37 |
| 18 | 1992 | 1422 | 105.8 | — | — | — | — | +34 | +99 | — | 29.4% | -1.41 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +0.17 | 1991 | 1668 | 121.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +80 | — | 48.8% | -0.26 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | 102.5 | +0.25 |
| 19 | 1993 | 1452 | 117.4 | — | — | — | — | 0 | +81 | — | 39.5% | -0.50 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.36 | 1992 | 1549 | 88.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 21.4% | -2.11 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–1 (67%) | 100.2 | +0.48 |
| 20 | 1994 | 1466 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | — | 38.9% | -1.56 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.12 | 1993 | 1435 | 87.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +1 | — | 10.0% | -3.15 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.43 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1465 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | -6 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.28 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1996 | 1469 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | — | — | — | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1500 | 107.7 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +85 | — | 35.1% | -1.06 | 5–11 (31%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.7 | +2.98 | — | 1694 | 113.9 | — | — | — | — | -88 | +47 | — | 44.2% | -0.58 | 7–11 (39%) | 9–6 (60%) | 98.5 | +4.64 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 3 | 3 | Nov 3, 1994 | H2H |
| Sabine Hack | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 5, 1995 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 16, 1993 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 6, 1993 | H2H |
| Katia Piccolini | 2 | 0 | 2 | May 5, 1993 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marzia Grossi | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 9, 1993 | H2H |
| Maja Zivec Skulj | 0 | 2 | 2 | May 5, 1993 | H2H |
| Sabine Hack | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 23, 1993 | H2H |
| Petra Langrova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 9, 1992 | H2H |
| Silvia Farina Elia | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 21, 1991 | H2H |