H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Maja Zivec Skulj vs Niki Ninaus H2H: 1-0

Maja Zivec Skulj holds a 1–0 lead over Niki Ninaus in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maja Zivec Skulj leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Maja Zivec Skulj won the 1996 Maria Lankowitz round of 32 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Maja Zivec Skulj
GER Age 52 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Niki Ninaus
AUS Age 52

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Maja Zivec Skulj 6-1 6-0 Niki Ninaus Match data Aug 8, 1996* R32 Maria Lankowitz Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Maja Zivec Skulj — — — 1,500 11 30 26.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Niki Ninaus — — — 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Maja Zivec Skulj Niki Ninaus
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1991 0–3 0.0% — 1,448 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1992 1–6 14.3% — 1,422 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1993 5–12 29.4% — 1,451 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1994 3–5 37.5% — 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,464 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1996 1–1 50.0% — 1,468 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,482 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Maja Zivec Skulj Niki Ninaus
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 4 12 16 25.0% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Maja Zivec Skulj Niki Ninaus
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1989 1485 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 1449 96.2 — — — — +44 — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 1422 105.8 — — — — +34 +99 — 29.4% -1.41 0–3 (0%) — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 1452 117.4 — — — — 0 +81 — 39.5% -0.50 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1994 1466 98.4 — — — — +5 — — 38.9% -1.56 1–1 2–0 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1995 1465 98.5 — — — — -6 — — 28.6% -1.28 1–0 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1996 1469 103.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.24 1996 1482 91.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.18
Career — 1500 107.7 — — — — +13 +85 — 35.1% -1.06 5–11 (31%) 3–2 (60%) 98.7 +2.98 — 1500 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +18.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.