H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Manon Bollegraf vs Eva Krapl H2H: 0-1
Eva Krapl holds a 1–0 lead over Manon Bollegraf in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eva Krapl leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eva Krapl won the 1988 Key Biscayne first round 6-2 4-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Eva Krapl | 6-2 4-6 7-6 | Manon Bollegraf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manon Bollegraf | #649 | #29 | 34 | 1,783 | 96 | 120 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Eva Krapl | #635 | #94 | 11 | 1,560 | 35 | 67 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manon Bollegraf | Eva Krapl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #129 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #115 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #117 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #202 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #44 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #160 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |