Manon Bollegraf
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | 1 | 5 | 6 | Feb 22, 1992 | H2H |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 1 | 4 | 5 | Oct 7, 1993 | H2H |
| Jo Durie | 3 | 1 | 4 | Oct 22, 1993 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 4 | 4 | Feb 15, 1992 | H2H |
| Florencia Labat | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 31, 1995 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Manon Bollegraf vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 0-1
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik holds a 1–0 lead over Manon Bollegraf in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik won the 1990 US Open round of 64 4-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 4-6 6-1 7-5 | Manon Bollegraf | Match data | Aug 30, 1990* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manon Bollegraf | #649 | #29 | 34 | 1,782 | 96 | 120 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,625 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Manon Bollegraf | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #117 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #160 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Manon Bollegraf | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1986 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1988 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1989 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1990 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1991 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1991 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1993 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1994 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1995 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1995 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | 53 | 54 | 107 | 49.5% | 19 | 32 | 51 | 37.3% | 17 | 22 | 39 | 43.6% | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | Career | 19 | 28 | 47 | 40.4% | 14 | 30 | 44 | 31.8% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Manon Bollegraf | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1986 | 1506 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | +84 | +24 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.96 | 1987 | 1504 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +1.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.37 |
| 1987 | 1568 | 113.0 | — | — | — | — | +53 | -71 | +15 | 42.0% | -0.38 | 5–3 (63%) | 0–4 (0%) | 99.8 | +0.69 | 1988 | 1578 | 125.8 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -8 | — | 45.5% | -0.15 | 4–3 (57%) | 1–2 (33%) | 102.9 | +0.45 |
| 1988 | 1557 | 120.4 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -114 | +72 | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–1 | — | -0.23 | 1989 | 1612 | 115.4 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -33 | — | 44.3% | -0.85 | 6–7 (46%) | 1–1 | — | +0.30 |
| 1989 | 1671 | 121.8 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -114 | — | 53.6% | +0.16 | 11–3 (79%) | 3–2 (60%) | 110.9 | +2.37 | 1990 | 1589 | 112.6 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -55 | — | 32.7% | -1.00 | 5–3 (63%) | 0–5 (0%) | 99.0 | -0.92 |
| 1990 | 1723 | 141.1 | — | — | — | — | +21 | -156 | -90 | 60.8% | +0.47 | 5–5 (50%) | 4–0 (100%) | 102.5 | -0.99 | 1991 | 1554 | 113.6 | — | — | — | — | -13 | -34 | +68 | 35.7% | -0.98 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | 99.8 | -0.11 |
| 1991 | 1717 | 129.2 | — | — | — | — | +13 | — | +1 | 51.8% | -0.05 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–1 (83%) | 103.1 | +0.23 | 1992 | 1520 | 104.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14.3% | -2.57 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.32 |
| 1992 | 1745 | 132.9 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -122 | -45 | 46.9% | -0.29 | 6–1 (86%) | 2–0 | — | -0.26 | 1993 | 1560 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.82 |
| 1993 | 1539 | 109.7 | — | — | — | — | +66 | -3 | +148 | 29.8% | -1.18 | 4–7 (36%) | 6–8 (43%) | 96.7 | +1.12 | 1994 | 1546 | 102.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.30 |
| 1994 | 1513 | 111.7 | — | — | — | — | +43 | +36 | +118 | 31.8% | -1.39 | 4–4 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 102.2 | +0.21 | 1995 | 1545 | 114.4 | — | — | — | — | +8 | -11 | +27 | 40.8% | -0.86 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–1 | — | -0.97 |
| 1995 | 1479 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | +46 | — | — | 34.8% | -1.17 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.3 | +0.41 | 1996 | 1527 | 113.8 | — | — | — | — | +25 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.60 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.67 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1515 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.13 |
| Career | 1782 | 128.1 | — | — | — | — | +32 | -75 | +31 | 45.8% | -0.36 | 41–35 (54%) | 25–21 (54%) | 109.0 | +2.10 | Career | 1625 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -29 | +45 | 38.2% | -0.87 | 23–24 (49%) | 6–16 (27%) | 97.8 | -1.28 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lori Mcneil | 1 | 3 | 4 | Nov 2, 1995 | H2H |
| Silke Meier | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Monica Seles | 0 | 3 | 3 | Apr 29, 1993 | H2H |
| Emanuela Zardo | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jan 20, 1993 | H2H |
| Laurence Courtois | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jun 13, 1996 | H2H |