H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Manon Bollegraf vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 0-3
Mercedes Paz holds a 3–0 lead over Manon Bollegraf in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mercedes Paz leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1989 Brussels semifinal 6-7 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 1989* | Brussels | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-7 6-4 6-3 | Manon Bollegraf | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1987* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-2 7-6 | Manon Bollegraf | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1986* | Singapore | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Mercedes Paz | 7-5 6-4 | Manon Bollegraf | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manon Bollegraf | #649 | #29 | 34 | 1,783 | 96 | 120 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manon Bollegraf | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #117 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1989 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1991 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #44 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1993 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #160 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1994 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |