H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Manon Bollegraf vs Wiltrud Probst H2H: 1-0
Manon Bollegraf holds a 1–0 lead over Wiltrud Probst in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manon Bollegraf leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manon Bollegraf won the 1986 Singapore third round 7-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1986* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Manon Bollegraf | 7-6 6-0 | Wiltrud Probst | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manon Bollegraf | #649 | #29 | 34 | 1,783 | 96 | 120 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wiltrud Probst | #794 | #31 | 344 | 1,757 | 119 | 161 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manon Bollegraf | Wiltrud Probst | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #135 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #80 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #90 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #140 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #40 | 1,707 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #117 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #105 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #69 | 1,630 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,723 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #146 | 1,616 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1991 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #113 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1992 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #44 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #84 | 1,620 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1993 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #160 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #194 | 1,569 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1994 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1995 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |