H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Andrea Vieira H2H: 1-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Vieira in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1992 Barcelona Olympics second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1992* | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Clay | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-2 6-3 | Andrea Vieira | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,131 | 464 | 185 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 19 |
| Andrea Vieira | — | — | — | 1,632 | 28 | 55 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Andrea Vieira | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,101 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,076 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,993 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,114 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,102 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,019 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,068 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,028 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 1,998 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,046 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,067 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |