H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 1-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Claudia Porwik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1990 Zurich fourth round 6-1 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 1990* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |