H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Gigi Fernandez H2H: 1-0

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Gigi Fernandez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1989 Key Biscayne round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Manuela Maleeva Fragniere
SUI Age 59 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Gigi Fernandez
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #8 6-2 6-2 Gigi Fernandez #56 Match data Mar 22, 1989* R64 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere #5 #3 148 2,130 464 185 71.5% 0 1 0 3 15 19
Gigi Fernandez #181 #17 247 1,911 227 217 51.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Gigi Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1982 15–10 60.0% — 1,687 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1983 21–16 56.8% — 1,788 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1984 50–16 75.8% #6 2,100 0 5 — — — — — — —
18 1985 46–18 71.9% #7 2,074 0 6 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
19 1986 42–21 66.7% #8 1,992 0 6 1983 4–8 33.3% — 1,524 0 0
20 1987 44–15 74.6% #8 2,113 0 8 1984 18–16 52.9% #27 1,722 0 0
21 1988 45–15 75.0% #6 2,101 0 10 1985 9–18 33.3% #64 1,655 0 0
22 1989 34–13 72.3% #9 2,018 0 12 1986 17–14 54.8% #57 1,728 0 1
23 1990 42–16 72.4% #9 2,068 0 12 1987 16–17 48.5% #39 1,681 0 1
24 1991 43–14 75.4% #10 2,027 0 15 1988 15–18 45.5% #53 1,683 0 1
25 1992 34–13 72.3% #9 1,998 0 16 1989 23–15 60.5% #23 1,808 0 1
26 1993 36–16 69.2% #11 2,045 0 18 1990 18–14 56.2% #36 1,764 0 1
27 1994 12–2 85.7% #5 2,067 0 19 1991 30–18 62.5% #22 1,808 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 1992 22–16 57.9% #32 1,806 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1993 17–17 50.0% #50 1,730 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1994 17–17 50.0% #32 1,789 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1995 11–13 45.8% #65 1,739 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 7–12 36.8% #112 1,687 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 3–3 50.0% #180 1,708 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Gigi Fernandez
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 27 5 32 84.4% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 7 4 11 63.6% 16 6 22 72.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1986 13 5 18 72.2% 13 6 19 68.4% 7 2 9 77.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
20 1987 9 3 12 75.0% 19 5 24 79.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 1984 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1988 23 5 28 82.1% 9 4 13 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 1985 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1989 15 5 20 75.0% 11 3 14 78.6% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1986 10 4 14 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1990 19 6 25 76.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 1987 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1991 16 7 23 69.6% 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 17 4 21 81.0% 1988 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1992 13 4 17 76.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 1989 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1993 16 5 21 76.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 1990 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1994 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — 8 1 9 88.9% 1991 17 10 27 63.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 9 8 17 52.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 145 53 198 73.2% 156 62 218 71.6% 38 20 58 65.5% 125 50 175 71.4% — 123 108 231 53.2% 10 21 31 32.3% 66 48 114 57.9% 28 38 66 42.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Manuela Maleeva Fragniere Gigi Fernandez
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1982 1687 121.9 — — — — -88 -61 -1 55.2% +0.14 6–2 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +1.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1788 136.4 — — — — -118 0 -127 57.1% +0.45 4–6 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.8 -0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 2100 169.1 — — — — -162 +37 -327 70.4% +1.55 13–7 (65%) 6–2 (75%) 112.5 -2.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1985 2075 161.4 — — — — -47 +9 -202 70.6% +1.90 6–4 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 +0.26 1982 1484 — — — — — — — — — — — — — +0.14
19 1986 1992 161.4 — — — — -4 +32 -50 65.7% +1.31 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 90.2 -2.54 1983 1525 107.0 — — — — +20 — +103 38.7% -0.81 3–4 (43%) — — +0.09
20 1987 2114 165.6 — — — — -24 -9 -171 68.6% +1.51 14–8 (64%) 4–5 (44%) 101.3 -3.96 1984 1723 133.3 — — — — -124 — +67 52.6% +0.51 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 97.5 +1.64
21 1988 2102 162.5 — — — — +47 -50 — 73.1% +1.85 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 96.3 -1.34 1985 1655 131.5 — — — — -67 — +69 36.7% -1.17 2–4 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -1.65
22 1989 2019 154.6 — — — — +29 +17 — 69.0% +1.48 5–3 (63%) 3–2 (60%) 98.1 +0.98 1986 1729 123.4 — — — — -5 -186 -44 55.4% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–2 (71%) 99.5 +2.46
23 1990 2068 173.2 — — — — +58 -41 — 68.5% +1.77 9–7 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.3 -2.84 1987 1681 134.9 — — — — -1 -163 +66 49.3% +0.08 4–3 (57%) 3–3 (50%) 102.3 +0.81
24 1991 2028 159.1 — — — — +51 +26 — 72.7% +1.77 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 +1.33 1988 1683 137.1 — — — — +26 — -6 47.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 97.1 -1.31
25 1992 1999 152.0 — — — — +87 +17 -90 67.0% +1.41 10–3 (77%) 2–4 (33%) 101.2 +2.30 1989 1809 145.5 — — — — +2 — -63 57.3% +0.71 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 103.4 -0.49
26 1993 2046 159.7 — — — — +80 -115 — 65.8% +1.04 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.2 -0.01 1990 1764 137.4 — — — — +14 — +11 57.5% +0.63 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 95.2 +0.43
27 1994 2067 143.1 — — — — +48 — — 77.4% +2.36 3–0 (100%) 0–2 — +0.52 1991 1809 133.9 — — — — -40 -257 +45 57.7% +0.35 11–4 (73%) 7–4 (64%) 107.7 +1.36
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1806 140.7 — — — — +7 -254 +46 56.0% +0.52 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 105.7 +0.99
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1731 133.0 — — — — -6 -139 +171 50.7% -0.20 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 102.5 +1.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1790 139.1 — — — — -26 -264 +163 51.9% -0.05 4–7 (36%) 5–6 (45%) 95.7 -0.06
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1739 124.8 — — — — -25 — +142 50.9% -0.33 4–7 (36%) 4–2 (67%) 98.5 -0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1688 129.4 — — — — -30 — +235 40.0% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.64
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1709 113.2 — — — — -56 — +219 46.2% -0.54 1–0 1–1 — -0.50
Career — 2131 166.2 — — — — +16 -4 -133 68.1% +1.46 97–70 (58%) 48–41 (54%) 101.4 -1.10 — 1912 141.7 — — — — -18 -208 +72 51.5% +0.08 72–72 (50%) 52–42 (55%) 103.1 +0.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.