H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere vs Hu Na H2H: 1-0
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 1–0 lead over Hu Na in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1988 Dallas third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1988* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-2 6-3 | Hu Na | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
| Hu Na | — | — | — | 1,701 | 60 | 94 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | Hu Na | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 11–16 | 40.7% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 | 1987 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 | 1988 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 | 1989 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 | 1990 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |